User talk:Defenderofthruth

Please feel free to leave any message ! --Defenderofthruth (talk) 13:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Just want to welcome you to Wikipedia. Please remember that you must remain signed in now when contributing, otherwise your contributions will be taken as sockpuppetry, and could face a possible block. Boomer Vial^Holla 13:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Boomer Vial, thank you very much for your welcome message. I will certainly remain signed in. --Defenderofthruth (talk) 13:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yakbul[edit]

Hey Yakbul can you read?

Bernard Lewis, Istanbul and the Civilization of the Ottoman Empire, 29; "Even when the land of Rum became politically independent, it remained a colonial extension of Turco-Persian culture which had its centers in Iran and Central Asia","The literature of Seljuk Anatolia was almost entirely in Persian...". --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas Bear Dude, the litterature and culture doesen't make the whole empire Turco-Persian.Today Iran is using pro-arabic scripts, following islam religion, does this makes them Irano-Arabic ? So let's put irano-arabic to the beginning of Iran page. This state Sultanate of Rum was a Turkic state, rulers were turkic, people were turkic (no iranian in anatolia), spoken language was turkic, but with putting Turco-Persian due to culture and litterature you are causing a severe misconseption about the state. I understand your nationalistic worries but we are writing history here. So please don't involve into a edit war, go check the new version of Sultanate of Rum, i think now article seems fair, plese feel free to discuss further issues.--Defenderofthruth (talk) 02:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is your opinion unsupported by any reliable sources. So, Yakbul, you show up at Sultanate of Rum, like you did at Seljuk Empire and start edit warring YOUR opinion against what reliable sources state. The only thing "Turkic" about either empires/sultanates was their rulers that used Persian and adopted Persian culture. Sorry this hurts your feelings, but time to get over it. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

lol are you kidding, was there one persian in anatolia at that time,the PEOPLE of that state was Turkic so that makes that state TURKIC you racist ignorant. Give me a resource showing 1 persian in anatolia;then i will stop discussing, besides the resources you show, says turco-persian TRADITION, when you click on Turco-Persian on page it redirects to Turco-Persian TRADITION page, so it must be written as Turco-Persian TRADITION not as Turco-Persian, with deleting the "tradition" word,i know that you trying to spread you ultranationalistic racist persian propaganda, and show the state as persian state.Probably,it hurts you really bad being ruled by Turkics under Seljuks than Timurids than Akkoyuns than Qara Qoyuns than Safavids than Kadjars, and you trying to take revenge from turks here, i dont know how much you are paid by Khamanei but nice job bro.--Defenderofthruth (talk) 11:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reported[edit]

See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]