User talk:Delusion23/Archive 3

Speedy declined of Natalie Abrahami

Hi. Just to let you know that Natalie Abrahami has been declined for speedy deletion, as sufficient notability was asserted (assertion through awards). Just a reminder, if an article asserts sufficient credible notability, even if it isn't referenced, it is not a candidate for speedy deletion. Thanks Stephen! ^Coming... 23:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

No worries, just wasn't sure if they were notable awards. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abdulkarim al-Khaiwani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yemeni

Hollands & Blair F.C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gillingham

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK

Hello User:Delusion23, I responded to your comment here. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 01:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions and help User:Delusion23! I really appreciate it! I responded to your comment here. I look forward to hearing from you soon. With regards, Anupam^Talk 16:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your message! I've replied there again. Have a good evening! Thanks, Anupam^Talk 04:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Much thanks for reviewing my nomination at DYK. That was my second DYK, the first one took a month to get promoted, so I was suprised to get a review on the first day. (It was such a strange match!) Some feedback: A review isn't needed for the first 5 noms but you can still do them anyway. Also, the lead needs a reference in your article. Thanks again and a hope I was a help! BCS (Talk) 05:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

women to drive revved up

Thanks for the DYK review at Template:Did_you_know_nominations/women_to_drive_movement. i've suggested some more alternative hooks - feel free to check my reasoning and make a new hook recommendation. Boud (talk) 09:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Phoenix Sports F.C.

Best Wishes from me and the wiki. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 16:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For the heads up. My brain hurts a bit right now but I will wade into that discussion soon. Yeah, that guy sent me a mile-long moan about how his version was best and we should all just accept it! His damage needs to be fixed up, but it'll be a long job. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Equatorial Guinea national football team

Can you reevaluate the class? Thanks in advance, BCS (Talk) 02:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I have  Done your suggestions. BCS (Talk) 03:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I will be gone for a few days, can you fill in for me? I was trying to get all the stub class articles to C-class before the start class ones. Also, when you tag for the task force it is extremely helpful, however, all men's national football teams are high importance, regardless. Maybe you should update the national football teams by class once a month (instead of every time class gets changed) so you aren't doing that many minor changes. Thanks a bunch, BCS (Talk) 00:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Whatever works best. It was a suggestion. BCS (Talk) 20:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sutton Athletic F.C.

Hello! Your submission of Sutton Athletic F.C. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Marrante (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Just a reminder to please reply to the question I have on your DYK nom. At some point, if you fail to reply, the nomination may be rejected for lack of interest on the part of the nominator and/or author as a result. After leaving the above notice, I saw that you already had a DYK with essentially the same reliance on first-party sources. I have seen this criticized in the past, but know that many things have appeared on DYK that some people feel strongly are unworthy, either because of a lack of adequate references, close paraphrasing of sources or worse. Please reply and if necessary, another reviewer can weigh in. Thank you. Marrante (talk) 17:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Please check back on the DYK nomination page. I left this link for you there several days ago. I'm concerned that someone will reject this nomination for lack of apparent interest on the part of the nominator if too much more time goes by. Thanks! Marrante (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I was trying to leave a post on the nom just as you did and it's too bad you beat me to the punch, because I had just realized that I had found a link to yet another club with the name Sutton and in light of your second DYK with similar content & refs, had decided to approve the nom. So, I just crossed out your post and went ahead and left mine in a second attempt. Sorry for all the confusion and delay. And I will avoid reviewing articles about British football clubs in future. Marrante (talk) 14:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

WP:FOOTY map

Thanks for your map, great incentive for improvement, Czech Republic went C-class today as well, so it would be nice if you can add that on. Thank you. - Cloudz679 15:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Delusion23 - incredible there's only one FAC amongst all that! I will be in touch once I have more improvements to report. Thank you. - Cloudz679 20:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lydd Town F.C.

Hello! Your submission of Lydd Town F.C. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Prioryman (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lydd Town F.C.

The DYK project (nominate) 09:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sutton Athletic F.C.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

CSD G7 tag on User:Delusion23/Sandbox/2001–02 Southern Football League

Hey, there's a {{db-g7}} tag on this page. Was that intentional? Do you want it to be deleted? --Chris (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Delusion23. You have new messages at Crazycomputers's talk page.
Message added 18:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Chris (talk) 18:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

NPL

Yep, no problem. I keep an eye on what's happening in the NPL even though you have it completely covered these days :) Getting towards the interesting part of the season now! Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

All done - that rather irritating fellow Arthur7171 did the Division One South table before I got there but he seems to have done everything correctly for once. According to the official site, Mickleover Sports were deducted three points recently, so I've put that in roughly as well. It's up to you if you want to format it a bit better and find a reference etc. Cheers! Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

My pleasure. Yeah, that guy is a bit too quick sometimes - the number of mistakes be makes on the Conference tables is staggering. He generally doesn't wait until the games are finished before editing the tables... Anyway, hard luck for FC against Frickley - sometimes it seems you can't buy that vital goal. £100,000 to be raised in a month? Good luck! It will all be worth it when that stadium is built. Life in the Conference South is a bit more comfortable than it was a month or two ago. For Truro, it was all about staying up and not going bust in the process. It turned out that life on the pitch was easier than life off it! We paid a big tax bill the day before we were to be wound up in court, and the transfer embargo was a real pain. Thought I was going to have to pull my boots on. But now we're free of debt and signed up to the Stadium for Cornwall, so hopefully we'll both be celebrating new stadiums before too long :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Woohoo!! Good news! I somehow knew you guys would manage it. Onwards and upwards! :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 10:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for edit

Hiya, just noticed you'd cleaned up the Catsarefuzzy vandalism on the Yellow Fever page. Thanks! Beth Holmes 1 (talk) 08:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

task force

Hi Delusion, I saw this [1], I was quite surprised. Was this a joke? Cloudz679 16:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For the multiple images of GBC/GB carts! :) Salvidrim! 01:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Delusion23. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 21:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 21:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

File:FIFA national football teams by class.png

I was looking at:

Is that automated or hand curated? And could you do one for women's national football teams? --LauraHale (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Awesome.  :) I'm just curious as to the quality of the women's articles and the map is really fantastic work. :) If there are women's countries missing articles, let me know and I can probably stub a few of them out. I really like the one map because it gives a quick and concise way of seeing the quality of articles. --LauraHale (talk) 18:56, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the map. :) Seriously good work. :) I really like it. :) I almost want to be mean and ask for a repeat with basketball for both men and women because they give a really interesting perspective. (And I kind of now want to create those national team articles that are missing for the women, but other things first.) --LauraHale (talk) 21:40, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Update note: There was some moving of stuff inside and outside the main space in the AFC so the ones that were originally brown may be back to brown after having gone orange. CAF teams: I think ten should now be B. (And then there are the issues with some of these countries possibly not having enough information. Sudan gets through GNG probably with out a team and I think it would withstand an AFD because of the Fatwa making the team notable for its non-existence.) Any update would be cool as I like seeing the changes. :D Shows editing work does pay off. --LauraHale (talk) 10:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

I love the women's map. :) It is a real inspiration for trying to improve articles. Please keep up the good work. :) In any case, I have been working on clearing my workspace and getting the wanted African women's articles created. Niger women's national football team, Madagascar women's national football team, Réunion women's national football team, Seychelles women's national football team, Sierra Leone women's national football team, São Tomé and Príncipe women's national football team are all created now. These teams have not played more than four games each. I think I probably self-assessed them all as Bs, but feel free to re-assess them as Cs. (Hard to determine the level of completeness for a team that has not played that many games.) --LauraHale (talk) 12:57, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Rwanda women's national team is GA. :) Also, still ZOMG! SO FANTASTIC! :D :D :D I really want to make it into an animated GIF to show the awesomeness. :D --LauraHale (talk) 23:56, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

After Saudi Arabia women's national football team and Cambodia women's national football team survived AfD, they were improved to B class articles (and are current GA noms). As some one was looking for men's national team articles that were easy Bs to take to GA, I had a look at them. Most of the Bs had major problems and a number of them were dinged back to Cs. --LauraHale (talk) 06:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Editing

Why did you delete the information on Foxdale A.F.C.'s page?

Please reply asap.

Thanks Kermeen12 (talk) 20:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

national team article help

Hi. I'm having problems trying to figure out how to deal with User:LauraHale/Chad women's national football team and User:LauraHale/Cape Verde women's national football team. The first does not have a team. The second I cannot prove if they have a team one way or another. Should these articles probably be moved over to Women's football in Chad and Women's football in Cape Verde instead? And redirect that national team article to those? --LauraHale (talk) 02:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Gresley FC

Hi again :) Trying to figure out which clubs are going where for next season, and Gresley have been promoted from the Midland Football Alliance, unless I'm mistaken. They'll be in the Northern League, no? Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:57, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

That's a pretty handy link :) I might wait until this conversion business is a bit clearer before doing a lot of work on the new articles, like creating new templates for new clubs etc. If people are just going to delete it all then it seems potentially like a waste of time. Like you, I can see the point of streamlining the template system, but just using wikitables means an enormous amount of extra work for people like me and you. It seems that discussion is already over, without them bothering to actually ask those editors who do all the work every week... I'm happy with wikitables for older seasons, i.e. those that have been completed - when I create Western League season articles, I always use wikitables. But for current seasons, it'll be a nightmare. Good luck to FCUM in that play-off by the way :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:52, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Exactly my thoughts. Updating all the tables takes quite a while as it is, without having to figure out goal difference etc as well. I thought you'd probably be at the game yesterday, that sounds like a great win at Chorley, who must have fancied themselves at home. Bradford look good too though, it's bound to be a tough game. Yeah, it'd be great to have a club like FCUM at Conference N/S level - it would definitely be deserved. I'm glad there's a regional separation though, Truro to Manchester is a bit of a trek ;) By the way I just had a problem with my rollback a minute ago, and reverted you on an article. I've reverted it back again, of course, but just to let you know it was an accident. Rollback seems to do that to me sometimes - I click on something in my watchlist, and bam, I've rollbacked somebody without ever meaning to do it. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Fingers crossed you can repeat that form! Yes, Dover is a ridiculously long way from Truro (I think it's actually slightly further than Manchester!!), and so is Chelmsford, Dartford (hope they win the play-offs!) and Thurrock (glad they went down!). We've got Billericay next season though, another long trip. Gloucester must be really sick of the travel, and I know Bishop's Stortford were pretty hacked off about being transferred to the Conference North. They even considered dropping down a league, but in the end they did well. We need a few more quality northern sides to get promotion! Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Nice goal! Could do with another one of those against Bradford. Or a scrappy one, whatever will get you through! Love that commentary, Match of the Day could do with hiring that guy. The Southern League article is a bit sparse for now, since we haven't started our play-offs or anything yet. I thought I'd wait for a fuller list before doing the maps and all, or maybe some enthusiastic Southern map fiend will jump in and do it for me :) The Northern League article looks great, almost ready to roll! What is it, just over three months away?!! Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:00, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

You added the maps/stadia to the Southern League article! That is much appreciated and will save me a lot of work in the long run, so thanks. Looking at my last post, I hope you don't think I was angling for you to do it! Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

You will get your reward in heaven for map creation, I'm sure! :) I've just started the 2012–13 Isthmian League article, although that is even more embryonic since the Div 1 North doesn't even have a champion yet, and the promotions from smaller leagues are still in the balance. There's certain to be transfers between the Isthmian and the Southern too. If you really fancy a map challenge, the two Division Ones don't have maps from last year to copy... if I recall, the clubs were so close together that everything I tried ended up in a mess. A London / South East map is required for that one really. At the time of writing, the Manchester derby still ain't going too well... :/ Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Incidentally, someone has changed the colour for Durham City on this year's Northern table. I would have thought pink was the right colour, since they asked the league to give them one of the relegation spots, so technically they were relegated. I usually use grey for teams that have folded. Thoughts? Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

2012-13

The Isthmian League have their 2012-13 line-ups confirmed, and King's Lynn Town F.C. aren't there. Looks like they're heading up your way. Meanwhile Halesowen Town F.C. reckon they're in the Evo-Stik North Div1 South next season. There's no room for them in the Southern League anyway now after Fleet were reprieved and Godalming transferred. So is there one club too many in the Northern League? Not sure if Retford are actually promoted or not. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

I was beginning to wonder if you'd retired! But then I saw the IP contributions and I wondered if it was you - they looked a lot better than the usual IP edits! Hope you had a good holiday. King's Lynn must have played more clubs than most teams - I was a little surprised to see them in the Evo-Stik North though. Yeah, the official allocations hopefully won't be too different - providing there's no more clubs going bust it should be straightforward. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy on Technal

While I understand your rationale, the article does have a template saying that it's a 'translation-work in progress'. Perhaps give it a bit more time? -Cntras (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Notability tag

Hi, why did you add the notability tag to

KRC Bambrugge ?

Klodde (talk) 15:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes they played already in the Belgian cup.

See: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beker_van_Belgi%C3%AB_2010-11/Voorrondes

Klodde (talk) 15:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

yes there are articles about other provincial clubs

example: K.V.V._Crossing_Elewijt

Klodde (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gillford Park F.C. logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gillford Park F.C. logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gillford Park F.C. logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Gillford Park F.C. logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Metrolink

Hey mate, just saw your request on the Mumps talk page—will you be doing the edits for when the station converts tomorrow, or is that all sorted? Darren•M540 ^U|_T|^C 17:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The official opening is at about 5.30 am BST. I won't be up to convert it then, but I could do the updates after midnight (i.e. once it's 13 June, opening day)

Haha of course! That's great, have fun! I'll be taking the camera there on Saturday to get some images for the articles! Darren•M540 ^U|_T|^C 17:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey up. Noticed you were changing hyphens to endashes on the Oldham branch, which makes a lot of sense. I've gone ahead and changed the rest of the network, including templates. Looks a lot better now IMO. Andrew (talk) 01:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Delusion23. You have new messages at WP:CFD/S.
Message added 09:29, 14 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 09:29, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Life Thru a Lens

Hello Delusion23. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Life Thru a Lens, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: See MOS:MUSIC#Capitalization. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for agreeing with me on my point, however it should be noted that the 2 people who disagree with me (despite the fact that it is certainly a possible consequence and frankly they should be banned for edit warring anyway) are both supporters of Scottish Independence hmmm.... so much for WP:PROMOTION — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.120.149 (talk) 11:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)