User talk:Demonte Morton

Welcome!

Hello, Demonte Morton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Piedras grandes 04:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Omarion, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 23:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Demonte Morton[edit]

A tag has been placed on your article Demonte Morton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Demonte Morton is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Demonte Morton. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. --Alex 17:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the tag that you removed from Demonte Morton. Please do not remove this tag unless you can indicate why Demonte Morton is really notable. Otherwise, it will be considered vandalism. --Alex 18:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chavo Guerrero and Eddie Guerrero[edit]

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McPhail 22:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

L.A. Timez[edit]

L.A. Timez has been proposed for deletion. Please review WP:NOT and WP:V for relevant concerns. NickelShoe 18:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Omarion[edit]

You have already been warned to stop removing content from the Wikipedia. If you do not stop, you will be blocked for vandalism. --Yamla 04:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions[edit]

Hey there. I didn't delete anything. I just saw that some article you started had been proposed fr deletion, and I thought you'd like to know. L.A. Timez is not deleted yet, and instructions for how to prevent its deletion are on the article. You could check the deletion log for the others to see who deleted them if you'd like them to explain it or possibly restore it. Click on the redlink and then click where it says "deletion log". It'll tell who deleted it and why. NickelShoe (Talk) 01:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Black Manta. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —Lesfer ^(talk/mail) 16:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages[edit]

Hi. The talk page for a user is the appropriate place to post comments for them. Ziggurat 00:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. [1] --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 01:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo Creed (Character)[edit]

Please see WP:CIVIL and try to make your point without offensive remarks. Thanks. PJM 01:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

--Yamla 16:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bad Newz Travels Fast[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bad Newz Travels Fast, by 198.103.221.52 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bad Newz Travels Fast seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bad Newz Travels Fast, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of DJ Pooh[edit]

DJ Pooh, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that DJ Pooh satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Pooh and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of DJ Pooh during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. WODUP 21:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Demonte Morton! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 873 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tomica Wright - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rasaq - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rasaq[edit]

I have nominated Rasaq, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasaq. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 22:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tomica Wright[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tomica Wright, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomica Wright. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Karppinen (talk) 18:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Apollo Creed[edit]

I have nominated Apollo Creed, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[2]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Evans (Good Times)[edit]

The article Michael Evans (Good Times) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page one source which oddly links to the article itself. The character is not notable. Possibly merge into Good Times otherwise delete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wlmg (talk) 01:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thelma Evans[edit]

The article Thelma Evans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has one source that oddly links back to the article itself. The character is not notable in its own right. Suggest merge into Good Times otherwise delete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wlmg (talk) 01:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thelma Evans for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thelma Evans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thelma Evans until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wlmg (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Evans (Good Times) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Evans (Good Times) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Evans (Good Times) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wlmg (talk) 16:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]