User talk:Denise BlueBird

Reelgood moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Reelgood. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have no Conflict of Interest and never wanted to advertise or promote anything on Wikipedia, I try not to violate any policy. I did this page on a request of my friend who once shared that she is unable to understand Wikipedia. I will submit as you directed, thanks Denise BlueBird (talk) 19:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reelgood (December 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lizthegrey was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NOTCRUNCHBASE and WP:CORPDEPTH. The provided sources are of routine funding announcements and "top x most innovative" lists, which lack editorial independence.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reelgood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

lizthegrey (talk) 22:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Denise BlueBird! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! lizthegrey (talk) 22:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reelgood (January 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NOTCRUNCHBASE and WP:CORPDEPTH. You must cite sources that indicate why Reelgood is notable. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reelgood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Reelgood[edit]

Hello, Denise BlueBird. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reelgood, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]