User talk:Deoleo

October 2017

Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you recently removed content from Carapelli without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carapelli, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 10:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Carapelli. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Carapelli. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 10:56, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]