Jump to content

User talk:Deporodh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Deporodh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

When you feel an article needs changing, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the Edit this page link. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use out the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.--Vidkun 21:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. an editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Reculement, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the editor does not believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the editor has explained why in the article (also see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues that have been raised at Talk:Reculement. If you remove the {{prod}}template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. James084 20:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HMS Hound (1846) (April 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Having located information about the specific Royal Navy vessel HMS Hound of 1846 initial sailing, I wish to add a page specific to that vessel instead of having it appear with no link in the broader laundry list of Royal Navy vessels of that name.
sources
1. https://sites.rootsweb.com/~pbtyc/18-1900/H/02324.html
2. https://threedecks.org/index.php?display_type=show_ship&id=4800
Yes, I had an ancestor aboard that ship. Not trying to advertise anything, just trying to make Wikipedia *more useful* by including information about the UNLINKED "HMS Hound" of the mid-19th century British effort to interdict the West African slave trade.
Anyone can doubtless do better than my tired attempt. Please do so. Deporodh (talk) 08:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Deporodh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:HMS Hound (1846), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]