User talk:Dhanakkad Seth

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dhanakkad Seth/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 08:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dhanakkad Seth/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dhanakkad Seth, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for assistance on your AfC draft

Hello, I saw your message requesting help on your AfC draft. You are correct, it does need more inline citations, please see WP:Referencing for beginners if you need help with this. I also suggest you take a look at the Manual of Style on how to better write your article, and use a neutral point of view when contributing to Wikipedia. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 11:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To, Mr.Roger W.Howarth, Though I have written in my article 'New Facts about Alexander the Great' much against the established beliefs, I want to know 1. Is my article worthless and totally abominable to reason? 2. I can put the whole of the Mahabharat,the only book in Sanskrit, which calls itself history,in the support of my articles. Will that be of any avail? ```````````````````` ``````````````````` ````````````````` ``````````````````

To Mr. Roger W. Howarth, This is to get doubly sure that my message has reached you. I hope, by now , you might have read my new article on Academia " New facts about Alexander the Great, Part III" and got clear of your misconceptions. You are free to raise your valid objections if you still have one. You should not do anything to strangulate truth. Let Wikipedia live to its high reputation.THANKS.

``````````` ``````````````````` ```````````````` ````````````````````

I had requested for the undeletion of my article ' New Facts about Alexander the Great' which was deleted by Mr. Roger W. Howarth. For the present I want to improve that article and not the one that has been restored. If possible, kindly undelete the requested article. Thanks.
                                                                              To Mr.Roger W Howarth.

This is a request for the reconsideration of the deletion of my article 'New Facts about Alexander the Great'.

User:Dhanakkad Seth/sandbox

Hello, Dhanakkad Seth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Dhanakkad Seth/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To help desk - Kindly let me know if the deletion refers to my latest AFC ie. Greek impact on Indian history. If my last submission is deleted, kindly undelete it . I would like to improve it further.