User talk:Digestiv

List of oldest twins[edit]

Mary Shipp Harrow died at almost 101 in 2017, as was pointed out, and Klara Auf der Maur-Moser as well, as you found out apparently (both cases having been deleted now) => https://www.todesanzeigenportal.ch/todesanzeige/der/Auf/Maur-Moser/Klara/ + http://www.aufdermaur.info/buch/2017%20634V%20Klara%20Auf%20der%20Maur.pdf, but what about all those British cases, since you erased five of those six (only the youngest ones left or remaining): are you English and do you know when at least one of all those twin couples died, please (an online proof of this would be even better, of course)? Extremely sexy (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read your talk page, and answer my question, since you have still been active afterwards apparently (just look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agnes_Rich&oldid=897102773)!!! Extremely sexy (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agnes Rich[edit]

The article Agnes Rich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. WP is not the Guinness Book of World Records, and the sources you provided do not establish notability adequately.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:47, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is in response to vandalism to List of the oldest living people here, vandalism to List of the verified oldest people here, and here, for a total of six disruptive edits to these two lists in about a day, all of which have been reverted by multiple editors. Newshunter12 (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Newshunter12, I think you're being a bit heavy handed here. I don't agree with Digestiv's edits to that page but it's quite clearly not vandalism.

To Digestiv, I would urge you to stop your unhelpful edits regarding Calment. Her longevity cliam is now quite clearly contested. It's quite fine to have a personal opinion either way on that claim but personal opinions should play no part in our editing here. We should aim only to give a fair and neutral treatment of matters and the contestation of Calment's claim has now received enough significant interest that it should be documented. Please desist from further direct edits and if you really want to take the matter further, take it to the talk page. But I doubt you'll get anywhere because it's quite clearly a contested longevity claim now. Oska (talk) 07:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oska With respect, as someone who has long edited in this topic area, such actions have happened many times in the past, often by the same people repeatedly, so I have a very different view of what constitutes vandalism on longevity pages. Also, pro-GRG, editing is a violation of the related arbitration case. This editor was repeatedly making edits that do not belong on these pages, which in my humble opinion is clearly vandalism even though it is not of the page blanking variety. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:30, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see no vandalism. I added Marthe Roch to the living list in good faith. You know that Marthe Roch was born on 19 August 1907, you’re just being difficult. You know that Calment was really 122, you’re just being difficult again, as is this “Georgia Guy” character and multiple other anti-longevity and anti-GRG people. Digestiv (talk) 06:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know no such thing. Provide a reliable independent source less then a year old stating Marthe Roch was born on 19 August 1907 and you are welcome to add her back. If not, she can never be legitimately on that list. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:30, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anna Eliza Williams[edit]

Hello, Digestiv. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anna Eliza Williams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]