User talk:Diivoo

Cyber Sunday

The articles wont be split. And no they are not different PPVs. Check out Cyber Sunday's history page at WWE.com [1] Taboo Tuesday is part of it's history. [2] So essentially, Cyber Sunday is the same PPV under a different name. Just though I'd clear that up. -- bulletproof ^3:16 20:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

One guy saying something should be done is not a consensus. There was a lengthy discussion amongst the WP:PW regulars and they decided it was okay to leave, because it is a house show and never will be televised, so it's not a spoiler. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my point is not, that it may be a spoiler (because it isn't). its just that we go by what wwe.com says and not what some fansite says. Diivoo 21:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just some fansite, every wrestling site, including the reliable ones, are now saying it's true. It just so happens that some fansite is being cited. WWE will acknowledge it soon. Besides, we include Antonio Inoki in the List of WWE Champions, even though his reign is not recognized at WWE.com. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 21:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if wwe will (and you say it right - future) acknowledge it soon, then wait until they acknowledge it. and who cares about inoki? Diivoo 21:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paul London and Brian Kendrick. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 21:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kane chokeslamming Finlay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kane chokeslamming Finlay.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 17:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RR 2008

The match is CONFIRMED. The info from iN DEMAND comes from WWE itself. Please stop removing the RR match or it will be considered vandalism. TJ Spyke 00:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edge's WHC match isn't listed there, but that was announced on SmackDown and is also in the preview for next week's SD. TJ Spyke 20:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From iN DEMAND, which is a reliable source (it's where we got the poster for RR, among many others). I was just pointing out that just because a match isn't on the official PPV page doesn't mean it hasn't been confirmed. TJ Spyke 23:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When to add matches

A broadcast of SmackDown in Australia s a reliable enough source to add matches. You cannot remove matches that have a reliable source, period. Consensus has changed. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 15:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link? Diivoo (talk) 15:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many fans in Australia saw the broadcast. Do we need to source things immediately after they happen in the US? No, we don't. Some articles sit with no source, besides the fact that everyone that watched SmackDown! saw them. Wikipedia is not US-centric. Bring it up at WP:PW if you like, perhaps a new consensus should be established. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 17:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A consenus WAS found on WP:PW and it stated that we dont wait for the US airing, but for a reliable source. I agree that wiki is not US-centric, but we should follow wikipedia standards, and as WP:V states, we need a reliable source. and like i said many times before, someone saying he saw it is NOT a reliable source. provide an uploaded video of the match and it is a source. Diivoo (talk) 19:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Perhaps I'm just tired, but I must have misread the article. Because I thought there was a source there already. WON, I believe. Maybe not. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from WWE Armageddon. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not remove sourced information from articles. Did you even read the source? [3] It's from wwe.com and confirms that TLC is taking place on December 13, which was the date originally cited for Armageddon. See also [4] where WWE no longer list Armageddon as an event. Please do not remove sourced information again. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 13:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]