User talk:Dilliedillie

Kittery Wagner moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kittery Wagner, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:NRU: "4. A women's national team in at least the semi-finals of the Women's Rugby World Cup" if you have notability concerns, go to AfD. -- Dilliedillie (talk) 17:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My question is do you have sources to show she played as per the guidelines? In the article it simply says she was in the squad. Before going to Afd I prefer to see if the editor who has created the page has the neccessary sources as Afd is a waste of time if they can be added. --Dom from Paris (talk) 10:26, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women Rugby stubs[edit]

Hi you have created quite a few stub articles and from the way you have written them I cannot tell if the subjects played in the RWC or not. If they did you must make this clear because if they didn't then they do not meet WP:NRU and the articles do not show they meet WP:GNG. They have to have played in a RWC for a team that made it to the semis to show notability and even then there should be other sources added later to show they meet WP:GNG --Dom from Paris (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GNG does not apply. the reliable source has a list of names, of each national team. [1]. that is good enough for WP:NRU. but if you want to re-litigate this, go for it. Dilliedillie (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey no need to get agressive. NRU says they have to have played and not just been selected. My question is simple are there sources to show they played in the RWC for a team that made it to the semis or not? You are new to Wikipedia so I understand that you may not get the intricacies of notability guidelines. I would suggest you have a look at the FAQ section on WP:NSPORTS especially the question number 2 that states

Q2: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline?[hide]

A2: No, the article must still eventually provide sources indicating that the subject meets the general notability guideline. Although the criteria for a given sport should be chosen to be a very reliable predictor of the availability of appropriate secondary coverage from reliable sources, there can be exceptions. For contemporary persons, given a reasonable amount of time to locate appropriate sources, the general notability guideline should be met in order for an article to meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. (For subjects in the past where it is more difficult to locate sources, it may be necessary to evaluate the subject's likely notability based on other persons of the same time period with similar characteristics.)

This is why I said "even then there should be other sources added later" I hope this clears up the situation for you. Dom from Paris (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... I now get the aggressiveness the substandard articles and the knowledge of Wikipedia that is not compatible with a newbie account. --Dom from Paris (talk) 17:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dilliedillie, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kittery Wagner, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dom from Paris (talk) 10:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 15:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilliedillie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi, I am not Sander whoever, please show your work, to make such a false statement; why should i appeal a ban of another editor? are you going to globally ban all who touch his content? is this what you mean by anyone can edit? Dilliedillie

Decline reason:

You are certainly not a new editor here, and your stub sourcing (and arguing about it) really does fit the Sander.v.Ginkel style. For example, arguing why subjects meet notability guidelines, but using only sources that do not say anything about meeting those same guidelines. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.