User talk:Dino52

Jeremy Szafron[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jeremy Szafron, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jeremyszafron.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Jeremy Szafron[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jeremy Szafron, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.jeremyszafron.com/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jeremy Szafron and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Jeremy Szafron, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jeremy Szafron with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jeremy Szafron. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Jeremy Szafron saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 20:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While not a word-for-word copy, the article is a close paraphrase and needs to be rewritten further (preferably from scratch) in order to avoid infringing copyright. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question on my talk page: firstly, you cannot copy and paste text from another website and call it a Wikipedia article; that's a violation of our copyright rules. Secondly, the article doesn't make a credible claim of notability — just being a reporter for a local television station doesn't cut it. Thirdly, the article doesn't cite any reliable sources about him. And finally: important how? Done our country proud how? No guarantees, but you might have a more keepable article if it explained how those things are true rather than just asserting them. Bearcat (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jszafron for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]