User talk:Dinushan w77
Nomination of Nissanka Senadhipathi for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nissanka Senadhipathi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nissanka Senadhipathi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020[edit]
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. creffett (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Talk page access revoked[edit]
I've upped the block to indefinite and revoked your talk page access. For appeal rights see WP:AAB. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
UTRS 30729[edit]
https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30729 is now closed. Response carried over:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that either the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks for more information.
--Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 22:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dinushan w77, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Ifnord (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dinushan w77. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal to the Unblock Ticket Request System or the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en wikimedia.org. creffett (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |