User talk:Disneyfolly2

Welcome!

Hello Disneyfolly2, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. McDoobAU93 (talk) 21:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Platinum Editions

You may want to respond here. I don't think the table should be completed until release order is confirmed. I cannot find on the press release where the order is set. Maybe I overlooked it, but all I can find is a list of films. Rob Sinden (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it's not constant vandalising - you should always assume good faith. Vandalising is soething different. Rob Sinden (talk) 21:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Fantasia 2000. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 03:45, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

You may have noticed that all of your edits are being reverted. You might want to stop and reconsider your editing. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not duplicate information that exists in the infobox navigation that already exists on the Disney animation pages. The timelines and "followed/succeeded" info is already present and did not need a separate box listing it. SpikeJones (talk) 02:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the edits you were making were not "minor" edits but were all flagged as such. In the future, please be aware of how you have that checkbox checked or not. The other WP editors will appreciate it SpikeJones (talk) 02:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ron Clements & John Musker Filmography

Template:Ron Clements & John Musker Filmography has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Platinum Editions

Hey there. I wanted to let you know that I've undone your recent edit at Walt Disney Platinum and Diamond Editions. While I have no doubt you were working to improve the article, I've seen this forum post used in other articles, so I'll say the same thing as I did then. Forum posts aren't considered reliable enough for use here. I'm sure if this is true, there should be some news releases on it somewhere from reputable sources, so I would suggest using Google/Bing to find them before attempting to add this back. Thanks, and happy editing! --McDoob AU 93 00:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but under that premise you should also undone source 30 from the Platinum Edition page, which is exactly the same source I used. I know that forums are not reliable enough but if you see this one, there are actual pictures of the booklet that's inside the new release of Lady and the Tramp. So the forum member is not just writing the information, he is backing up with actual pictures of the source. I think that is reliable enough because soon that release is going to be out and everyone will see the same booklet that are in the pictures. Please consider this. Thank you. Disneyfolly2 (talk) 00:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If there's this much info, then it should be no problem finding a press release or some news report instead of a forum. And I'll go check out that source and see if it needs to be removed as well. --McDoob AU 93 00:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Casablanca (film). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Tale of Princess Kaguya (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the US rights for the film and that it will release it with a new English dub in the fall.<ref>{http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/gkids-acquires-takahatas-the-tale-of-the-princess-kaguya-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]