User talk:DixiePolitics

2009 va gov,[edit]

Hi how did you make your map Jm33746 (talk) 05:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I used QGIS to make the map and the data was from Virginia Department of Elections DixiePolitics (talk) 06:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you make a YouTube video on how to do this or at least give steps or resources you used Jm33746 (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cinyc has a YouTube tutorial on how to make precinct maps

Look for the video that says Virginia DixiePolitics (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been trying to build this map but I have not been able to Jm33746 (talk) 18:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make a video making a precient map Jm33746 (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Search up "QGIS Election Map Tutorial" from my friend OrcaLord DixiePolitics (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2010 PA House Precinct Map,[edit]

Hi, I just saw you removed the precinct map. I saw your reasoning but don't really understand what you meant. Could you explain what I did wrong so it can be fixed? All data was acquired from the VEST website.

Your color ramp in QGIS must be wrong or you didn't correctly use a formula in Microsoft Excel that makes clean percentages.T

There are definitely precincts in which the Democrat or Republican received 50-60% of the vo. I'll refer you to my Twitter @AugustaPatriot so we can remedy this issue e in DixiePolitics (talk) 17:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be very eager to discuss. I just followed you @Charlotte_NEPA. It won't let me message you. CharlotteLovesRoses (talk) 04:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ill try to see if I can message you DixiePolitics (talk) 04:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DixiePolitics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not this "fenetrejones" person that "RoySmith" is talking about. The only thing I add to Wikipedia are precinct,county, congressional,state house,state senate and other maps. This is a clear mistake and "fenetrejones" was originally banned from Wikipedia for vandalizing Wikipedia pages of Florida state senators. The only things I have done regarding the state of Florida was adding precinct maps to some of their elections. So if you could please review this block and come back to me, I would greatly appreciate it. DixiePolitics (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account wasn't blocked until now, since I assume you didn't pull that information out at random. Seems to be sock puppetry to evade your block and ban. 331dot (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2024[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock| Where is your proof that I'm a sockpuppet? The only reason you have provided for not reversing the block @331dot is "sock". I have not vandalized anything on Wikipedia and if you think otherwise please show me said wikipedia page that I have violated. Again I make political maps. I don't vandalize pages of politicians and famous people. So again give me a sufficient reason that I have been blocked and if you don't have one, please reverse this mistake and let me continue what I have been doing for the past 6 monthes. DixiePolitics (talk) 00:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK DixiePolitics, the proof of your sockpuppeting--I'm looking at it. Don't be silly. I also blocked [[User talk:RustbeltPolitics], by the way.

D*** it, 331dot, we finally get some decent DixiePolitics in this liberal joint and they're just another socking troll? That's so sad. For the record (since I haven't looked at the SPI, if there is one), they're confirmed with User:Donald Melvin and User:GAPoliticsFan. DixiePolitics, c'mon man. Drmies (talk) 00:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did add to the SPI. 331dot (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did create RustBeltPolitics to create precinct maps based in the Midwest It would be a little weird to make maps in the Midwest on this account since this one focuses on southern elections. I haven't vandalized anything in this account. The only thing I have done is added sufficient information to Wikipedia like election maps. Again if this is some personal vendetta against me, take it up with me on Twitter DixiePolitics (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't discuss blocks on Twitter or X or whatever Musk calls it. You can discuss it right here, and add closing brackets to your request to formally open this matter for review by a heretofore uninvolved admin. 331dot (talk) 00:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DP, your request is missing the closing brackets, so no one will see it. I gave the reason for the block in my earlier decline. 331dot (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DixiePolitics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm telling you if you look through all of my edits on this account I haven't violated anything. The only other account I created was RustBeltPolitics to focus on elections in the Midwest.Have some compassion and empathy @331dot. I haven't vandalized one page and the proof is in my edits. DixiePolitics (talk) 00:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're done here. Socks of a banned user, with no idea what our policies are (perhaps) and no intention of adherint to them. Drmies (talk) 01:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are banned from Wikipedia under Fenetrejones, so you shouldn't be making any edits at all, good or bad. I didn't bring up that name, you did out of the blue. 331dot (talk) 00:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me tell you the full story @331dot. When I accidentally logged out of my account at approximately 1:00 I logged back in and said I was blocked by @RoySmith by socckpuppeting this "fentrejones" person and then I was blocked by you apparently for the same thing. I literally never vandalized any pages or have impersonated anybody. Just leave me alone and let me continue making precinct maps for Wikipedia. DixiePolitics (talk) 00:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not every statement needs to be an unblock request, you only need one open request. So you are just randomly on the IP of a banned user and just coincidentally happen to be editing about politics and are confirmed to other accounts? Since you are just insulting my intelligence at this point I have nothing else to add. Someone else will review this. 331dot (talk) 00:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalizing though. How am I insulting your intelligence? Get out of here and find me a real professional to review this DixiePolitics (talk) 00:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to think its okay to evade your ban as long as you make good edits. It's not. Okay, I'm done now. 331dot (talk) 00:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done with this bull. I can just create another account easily. Have fun trying to find me Mainer. DixiePolitics (talk) 00:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are going to continue to disregard policies and the ban because you find them inconvenient, there is nothing else to discuss here. I've removed your access. 331dot (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 00:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Fenetrejones per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fenetrejones. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 12:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]