User talk:Djclimber

License tagging for Image:Cook out menu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cook out menu.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Cook out cup.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cook out cup.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Sly doc

A tag has been placed on Sly doc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Onorem Dil 22:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raleigh fills a void for classical

I am sure the college stations in Raleigh and Chapel Hill will fill the void, how about a daily classical music show on your station. - My concern was WUNC could not do classical music better(?), but they tried, and now 'UNC no longer does this, and here is the WUNC-FM article. - But, I am sure WCPE is still broadcasting classical music full-time, they are NOT off the air between midnight and 6AM.

--4.160.183.156 17:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stratocumulus lenticularis.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Stratocumulus lenticularis.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]