User talk:Dkjhbrewfhyjegfuygf

Welcome

Hello, Dkjhbrewfhyjegfuygf! Welcome to Wikipedia! You were reverted on the Megan Fox article here and here because your edits are lacking in Wikipedia formatting style and/or are unnecessary, unsourced or poorly-sourced. Since you are a newly registered Wikipedia editor, I believe you will benefit from clicking on some or all of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Flyer22 (talk) 17:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

May 2012

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. JNW (talk) 18:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. JNW (talk) 18:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Megan Fox, you may be blocked from editing. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 19:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changing user name

Hi, I noticed that you have a user name which may be difficult to type or remember. If you would like to change it, see WP:Changing username which explains how to request this. The sooner the better! – Fayenatic London (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 21:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit-warring, despite previous short block, and addition of poorly-sourced and/or copyright material to BLPs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you are trying to improve these articles, but:

For an encyclopedia article, adding a lot of detail is not necessarily an improvement. In particular long plot summaries are not appropriate - see WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WAF.
What you have been adding was copied from places like this and this. You must not copy material into Wikipedia, it could cause serious legal problems. Please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
For articles about living people it is particularly important that anything added is supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a gossip magazine.
Edit warring is not allowed, because it means that articles end up in the form preferred by the most obstinate edit-warrior. If your contribution is reverted, do not just repeat it - discuss the issue on the article talk page, explaining why you think your edit improves the article, and try to reach WP:Consensus with other users. If you cannot reach consensus, use WP:Dispute resolution.

Now that I have explained all this, if after this block expires you continue edit-warring and adding copyright material, your next block is likely to be indefinite. JohnCD (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem....

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Safehaven86 (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as seen in Jennifer Check, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- WikHead (talk) 11:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for WP:disruptive editing of the same type you were blocked for before. If you continue when this block expires, the next is likely to be indefinite. Please read the advice I gave you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 21:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Your addition to The Wedding Band has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Synopsis section copied word-for-word from official website: http://www.tbs.com/stories/story/0,,263314,00.html Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to CEU Cardinal Herrera University has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Text copied from http://www.md-uch.com, including: http://www.md-uch.com/About_ceu.html, http://www.uchceu.com/en/university/index.aspx?op=mentoring_scheme, etc. See this edit: [1] Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:48, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Na Nai'a Legend of the Dolphins has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The entire page was one HUGE cut/paste copyvio from various sources, including: http://www.mauinews.com/page/content.detail/id/549826/Megan-Fox-latest-luminary-to-join-Maui-Film-Festival-s-galaxy-of-stars.html?nav=5016 and http://mauinow.com/2011/06/13/all-star-cast-joins-hawaii-filmmaker-in-bringing-dolphin-magic-to-the-big-screen/ and http://www.dolphinmovie.com/press.html#conversation and http://www.dolphinmovie.com/about.html, etc. Logical Fuzz (talk) 02:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks, and the explanation I wrote for you on 31 May, higher up this talk page, first. JohnCD (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]