User talk:Dlc 73

Hey Dlc 73![edit]

Thanxs for all your contributions to the Taiwanese American and Taiwanese Canadian pages! If you have any questions, please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Keep up the good work. Have fun editing! =D Jumping cheese ^Contact 04:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit to the Taiwanese Canadian page. A word of advice: a page only needs one wiki link for all the same words that are mentioned in the page. Having too many wiki links makes it hard to read the text. =D Jumping cheese ^Contact 06:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Deer[edit]

I am inclined to agree with your additions, but they are not referenced, so they are potentially a vilation of no original research. If you can provide a source for the information, then it may warrant inclusion. Thanks.--MONGO 06:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please start adding edit summaries.-Crunchy Numbers 05:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, as we discussed in email...you must add references to the Red Deer article, or I will have to remove the additions. Regardless, I am splitting the articles in two as new evidence indicates they are essentially two species. PLease start contributing to the talk pages and use edit summaries, or your information will be reverted. Thnaks.--MONGO 06:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the contribution to the talk page on Red Deer!--MONGO 05:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Central Asian Red Deer[edit]

Central Asian Red Deer...good job...--MONGO 14:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Red Deer.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Red Deer.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The study was done on Cervids[edit]

That DNA study was one on a number of different Cervids, so to say it was just Red Deer or Wapiti is inaccurate.--MONGO 20:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still not quite right...the study also looked at a number of other species...what's wrong with calling them Cervids or Cervus?--MONGO 20:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries and[edit]

It would make things easier for other editor if you added an edit summary and consolidated some of your edits. Perhaps using the "show preview" button would help. On the Elk page you have been making multiple edit at a rate for more than one every five minutes. This makes it very combersome for others to review. These might be helpful pages Help:Edit summary and Help:Show preview Thanks.--Counsel 21:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 11:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

article: Elk[edit]

I saw the correction. I have to apologize for the mistake. But the next paragraph includes an incorrect information (C. affinis was analyzed by Ludt et al.) also, doesn't it? I was misled by the information. Please correct it. --Janus01 16:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elk (Cervus canadensis)[edit]

We'll have to figure out why we are now calling them ecotypes...what does that mean exactly? I also need you to please add references to the article. It will never be a featured article if we don't add references to things. I really appreciate your help, so if you could either email me with the source of the information, as you have been, or add it to the article yourself, it would be greatly appreciated.--MONGO 04:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge ?[edit]

Do you think Kashmir stag and Tibetan red deer should be merged ? Please go ahead if you are aware of the current taxonomic status. They are both stubs that seem to be badly supported by citations. Shyamal 05:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]