User talk:Dliptak

August 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Northwestern Christian University NCU. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Arjayay for the feedback I have moved all the internal links as external links, thank you for the feedback Dliptak (talk) 21:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Dliptak! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 13:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I do need help with one of my articles. Dliptak (talk) 06:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Northwestern Christian University NCU moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Northwestern Christian University NCU. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 13:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikishovel can you have a look now and give me some tips, I have moved all the internal links as external and used peer reviewed and crediable sources, have a look and let me know what you think. Dliptak (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, new submission undertaken could you please check and see the changes are ready for publication, kind regards Dliptak (talk) 07:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northwestern Christian University (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Northwestern Christian University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 04:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dliptak! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 04:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CFA can you please have a look now, I have moved any internal links and citations and have removed them or moved them to external. I have gone over the citations and requirements for wiki referencing can you please now check. Thank you for the feedback, kind regards David Dliptak (talk) 06:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northwestern Christian University (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Northwestern Christian University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 15:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CFA thank you for the feedback I have moved all

strictly independent of the subject references to the external links
As for the in-depth references some of these are extensive and peer reviewed, which ones in particular need clarification?
Any assistance would be helpful

Kind regards David:) Dliptak (talk) 10:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Northwestern Christian University has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Northwestern Christian University. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]