Jump to content

User talk:Dmil3422

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome and a note

[edit]

Hi Dmil3422, welcome to Wikipedia! I wanted to say hello and leave you a note about Wikipedia policies. Based on some of your edits and uploads, it's possible you may have a conflict of interest regarding the topic Merlin Tuttle. If you have a conflict of interest, especially if you are receiving compensation to make edits to Wikipedia, it is vital that you read this guide to conflict of interest. It's generally considered best practices to not edit articles about yourself, your family or friends, your organization, your clients, or your competitors. You can also find Wikipedia's policies about paid editing here. If you have questions, you can reply below or leave me a message on my talk page. Enwebb (talk) 21:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Dmil3422 (talk) 22:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Wikipedia policies can be very overwhelming for new editors! I have copied over your COI disclosure to the talk page for Merlin Tuttle for transparency, and I appreciate your honesty (as will all Wikipedians). You've done a pretty good job so far, though I haven't done more than glance over the article. Something that is really important to Wikipedia is what we call verifiability. We show that information is verifiable by adding citations to what we call reliable sources. Reliable sources are things like books, newspaper articles, scientific journals, respectable websites, etc. and not things like personal correspondence/emails or blogs.
In general, for each piece of information, Wikipedians want to see the reliable source that is associated with that information. If you state someone's date of birth or place of birth, there should be a citation to the source that shows the information is verifiable. Otherwise, it could be removed. Making sure content is all verifiable is especially important for what we call biographies of living people.
The image you uploaded here could possibly get deleted, by the way. It is published under copyright and there is not sufficient evidence that you are the owner of the photograph, and thus, the one who may release it for use on Wikipedia. If you do, in fact, own the rights to the photograph (you took it), you can follow the directions here about proving you own the rights. In general, photographs have to be released to Wikipedia by the person who took the photograph. If you would like to use this photograph, you can contact the photographer and ask them to upload it to Wikimedia Commons and release the rights.
As an aside, I'm a big fan of bats and Merlin's work in general! Enwebb (talk) 00:10, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merlin Tuttle

[edit]

I enjoyed the update to Merlin's page! I worked to partially overhaul his page last year, and it's awesome to see that the article has continued to grow! Anyway, just wanted to drop a note. Merlin's The Secret Lives of Bats is what really got me interested in bat stuff.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Dmil3422, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gammage Hats

[edit]

Very cool article! Very cool subject. It looks like there are images of the hats that are public domain, but I'm not sure if they're Gammage hats or inspired by Gammage hats. Can you take a look? It would be great to have photos. Thanks and happy editing! JSFarman (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JSFarman: Thanks for your comment and interest! Good to know there may be images available in the public domain, I will take a look into that. Please feel free to edit or contribute anything as you see fit! I'm new to this whole Wikipedia thing. Dmil3422 (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added a couple more references and accepted the article. It was such a blast to research; I had no idea that one person (or one company) designed so many iconic hats. (Stevie Ray Vaughan!) You may be new to the whole Wikipedia thing but you're killing it. Thank you for writing the article, and ping me if you ever need help. JSFarman (talk) 06:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manny Gammage's Texas Hatters Inc. has been accepted

[edit]
Manny Gammage's Texas Hatters Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JSFarman (talk) 03:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laron syndrome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Myocardial stunning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ventriculography.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Salimfadhley (talk) 00:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dmil3422! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Salimfadhley (talk) 00:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael J Ryan

[edit]

Hi :) Can you please help me understand the purpose of the long list of publications under the heading 'References' in the Michael J Ryan (biologist) article? They're not used as references (footnote citations etc.) within the article. I assumed first that they are intended as a list of the person's works, but there is already an earlier section titled 'Bibliography', so perhaps I assumed incorrectly? Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Hi, yes my intention is to include a list of notable journal publications separate from his book publications but I supposed that could be done with a subsection instead of listing them in references! I will make the necessary changes to clarify! Thank you. Dmil3422 (talk)
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manny Gammage's Texas Hatters Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockhart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Dmil3422. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Merlin Tuttle's Bat Conservation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dmil3422. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Merlin Tuttle's Bat Conservation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]