User talk:Docoed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On your draft article[edit]

Here is a belated formal welcome, Docoed! Two pages I found useful when I was new to Wikipedia were the simplified ruleset and the welcome page. Do take a look at those if you have the time.

Thanks for your excellent work on your draft article; myself and another editor have tweaked the formatting somewhat. Things that would be useful include

  • His exact birth and death date
  • Any web links, ISBNs or other ways to access or refer to your sources (only if they are available, of course!)
  • Making it clear how this guideline is met.

Best of luck with uploading the images of his paintings; you know where you can find me if you need me, but should I not be online, you can contact me at my talk page or by email. Cheers, sonia 09:20, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as you're new to article writing, you might want to read your first article, a guide on article writing fundamentals for newcomers. Welcome to Wikipedia! :) Kind regards, —James (TalkContribs)7:45pm 09:45, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice work on the article :) Don't forget to add accessdates for your references by appending "|accessdate=yyyy-mm-dd" or "Retrieved on yyyy-mm-dd" (if the reference doesn't use a [[Wikipedia:Citation templates|citation template) to the end of each reference. Do keep up the good work, don't forget to use edit summaries as they help people get an idea of what your edit constituted and if you do notice a missing article, create it :) —James (TalkContribs)6:18pm 08:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jay Meuser[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations! Your article did make it onto the main page :) sonia 03:13, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Docoed, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Pedro Art Association (October 11)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/San Pedro Art Association, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Docoed. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "San Pedro Art Association".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/San Pedro Art Association}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Please help me with...

I was working on page for the San Pedro Art Association and have been waiting on some critical info that can resolve my last editor's comments. It has been over 6 months and I was informed that I might have my work deleted. I requested that it not be deleted and I have not received notice on the decision. I am not sure if I should wait longer (its been about a month) or get help on this. I'd hate to start over.

docoed

docoed (talk) 21:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Helped via IRC. Reventtalk 21:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Please help me with...Hi, I was working on page for the San Pedro Art Association and have been waiting on some critical info that can resolve my last editor's comments. It has been over 6 months and I was informed that I might have my work deleted. I requested that it not be deleted and I have not received notice on the decision. I am not sure if I should wait longer (its been about a month) or get help on this. I'd hate to start over.

docoed docoed (talk) 21:26, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I Docoed, I'm not sure what the critical info is you're looking for, but it looks like the article was declined because of insufficient sourcing. You'll need to find sources that discuss the San Pedro Art Association specifically. Right now I only see one that seems to do this, although without access to the offline sources this can be hard to determine. Let me know if that helps. --Daniel(talk) 21:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Helped via IRC, G-13 was declined by an admin, noted request for delayed G-13 on draft, and asked it not be re-tagged for another 6 months. G-13 is just housekeeping anyhow, keeping the draft around longer is noncontroversial. Reventtalk 21:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/San Pedro Art Association. Thanks! Reventtalk 21:40, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Pedro Art Association has been accepted[edit]

San Pedro Art Association, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 13:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Please help me with... Hi, On the page for the San Pedro Art Association, four of the references show an error and they are marked in red. I believe the problems can be easily fixed but when I click the "edit" for that section, the references do not show up. All other sections of the San Pedro Art Association page can be edited except the Reference section. How can I get in to fix the Reference section?

Thank you

docoed (talk) 08:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC) docoeddocoed (talk) 08:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Docoed. The references themselves are actually kept within the body of the article - the "References" section just contains the template {{Reflist}}, which copies the information from higher on the page and displays it. I've now fixed the date formats (took me couple of edits); you had included the page parameter in the date and a couple of them needed fixing to meet the MOS requirements in order to display correctly. You can see what I did here. Yunshui  10:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]