User talk:DogukanOdaci

June 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm ElHef. An edit that you recently made to Talk:Turkey seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --ElHef (Meep?) 20:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Northern Cyprus has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Northern Cyprus was changed by DogukanOdaci (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957145 on 2015-07-01T14:12:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Northern Cyprus. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 14:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Northern Cyprus. Alex2006 (talk) 04:15, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive edits in the Turkey article[edit]

You are reverting without writing a logical reason for explaining and justifying your point of view. I will report you to an Administrator if you continue being a troll. Heimdallr of Æsir (talk) 08:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Heimdallr of Æsir (talk) 08:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Darkwind (talk) 06:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing continues[edit]

Immediately after your block expired, you repeated the disruptive edit that lead to your block in the first place. Therefore,

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please stop changing figures without providing a reliable source to support your changes, or you may end up blocked indefinitely. —Darkwind (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ceradon (talk • contribs) 20:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]