User talk:Domwilson86

Welcome!

Hello, Domwilson86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Aledification, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 16:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Aledification[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aledification requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 16:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we have a policy to not have unsourced articles the do not contain anything else but (negative) implications on living persons. Moreover, even if there was a myspace link, that is still a long way form having a notable phenomenon covered by [[WP:RS|reliable sources}}. So i will am willing to accept that no harm was intended (and you will have to forgive me here to err on the side of caution as we have many such pages), i still see little room for restoring it. My suggestion would be to hang around edit a little bit and maybe revisit this in case a few newspaper write about it. If you need any other help let me know.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately Wikipedia is not for recent and very new concepts, so lack of references is very pertinent here. As i said keep in the back of your mind until things change--Tikiwont (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]