User talk:Dontlie15

Please do not delete verified information. Nuix

Pyrmontnews (talk) 00:15, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User has been repeatedly warned to refrain from removing verifiable text from the article Nuix.Pyrmontnews (talk) 01:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dontlie15. You have new messages at Katanada's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Katanada (talk) 04:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nuix. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 00:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Nuix constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thanks. Pinkadelica 01:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Nuix, you will be blocked from editing. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 01:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Nuix, you will be blocked from editing. You seem to have a conflict of interest with this subject. Would you please take it up on Talk:Nuix? Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 01:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Nuix (from my talk page). The "COI rule" exists to prevent disruptive edits from individuals that are closely involved with articles' subjects. As I said, your repeated removal of sourced information constitutes vandalism. If you believe that the other user has a conflict of interest and only wrote the article to defame the organization, you are free to say so and begin a discussion on the article's talk page. Blanking the article is however not an appropriate response. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 01:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note also that your edits on Nuix are in violation of the three-revert rule, which forbids reverting any article more than three times in a 24-hour period. In a situation like this, discussion of the issues on the talk page is more constructive than starting an edit war. —C.Fred (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Nuix. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While the company's website can be consulted as a source for information, wholesale copying of text from it is not allowed. —C.Fred (talk) 01:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]