User talk:Donwharton321

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Reunion.com appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Mysdaao ^talk 13:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is an objective fact that Reunion.com has fraudulently acquired email addresses from people who attempt to sign up as members.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Reunion.com. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop putting this warning in the article. If you have references that support your assertion about their behavior, you may add them. But Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the article should be kept factual and neutral. Thank you. Mysdaao ^talk 13:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can provide friends who have had the same experience. This is not just my personal experience.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Reunion.com, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not the place to be warning people like this. Please stop. Mysdaao ^talk 13:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the web site is using grossly unethical practices this is most certainly where such iformation should be posted.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Reunion.com, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The type of warning you are trying to put in the article has no place in Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia, not a forum to warn consumers. Any information you put into an article must be neutral and added with independent, reliable sources. Mysdaao ^talk 14:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to provide information to support the neutrality and objectivity of my posted views.

Warnings about Reunion.com[edit]

Donwharton321, telling people to avoid this site at all costs is not neutral content, and it doesn't belong in Wikipedia.. If what you say is an objective fact, you must provide sources to prove it. Saying it happened to your friends too is not enough. You must show a reliable, published source, which is usually done by linking to news websites that have this information. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view for a full explanation. And please let me know if there are any more questions or concerns. Thank you. --Mysdaao ^talk 14:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And any further abuse from this account will result in an immediate indef. block. You have been put on a very short leash. seicer | talk | contribs 14:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say the same thing. Please take Mysdaao's advice above. KnightLago (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]