Jump to content

User talk:Doogierev

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Doogierev, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Doogierev! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Seddon (February 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 06:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Seddon (February 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 17:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Seddon (February 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 14:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joe Seddon has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joe Seddon. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Seddon (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Seddon (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 13:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Doogierev. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Joe Seddon, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Doogierev. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Doogierev|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers, I can confirm that I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. I am an independent / outside observer who has been tracking the subject matter for a while now and I thought he deserved an article given his coverage in the British press. Doogierev (talk) 23:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify how you came by this photo, which you've claimed as your own work? signed, Rosguill talk 22:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, it was taken from a Twitter user who referenced the subject who I asked permission from. I mistakenly clicked that the photo was mine own. This was a mistake and it has now been removed from the article. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Doogierev (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Seddon (May 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by RoySmith was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: After being declined 5 times, resubmitted with no changes. Enough is enough.
-- RoySmith (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Seddon for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Seddon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Seddon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 22:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Seddon moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Joe Seddon, appears to be WP:COI/WP:PAID editing, and so needs to go through our Articles for Creation review system. If you think it is ready for review, you may submit it using the template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Joe Seddon, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Oxbridge. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please read about overlinking. David Biddulph (talk) 18:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]