User talk:Doug Funny

Your edit to New York Giants[edit]

Your recent edit to New York Giants (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Doug Aldrich, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. —Wrathchild ^(talk) 19:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Continued vandalism[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Prospect, Connecticut, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 13:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to United States, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 02:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Doug Funny, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AngelOfSadness talk 21:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit to Will Smith[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Will Smith, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others.
~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 03:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Douglas Aldrich[edit]

A tag has been placed on Douglas Aldrich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 13:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]