User talk:Douglerner

March 2013

Hello, Douglerner. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Webx forum software, you should consider our guidance on Conflicts of interest and take a look at the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 23:37, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I am being neutral and simply changing objective facts such as updating names and dates and making factual corrections and additions. It is not a controversial article - merely a technical one.

Doug Lerner (talk) 00:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Donner60. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to John A. McDougall seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am striking the above message because your message to me pointed out that both points of view are still represented and that the contrary point of view may have had undue weight. I think I focused only on the deletions and not the remaining material so I apologize for my oversight. Donner60 (talk) 03:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]