Jump to content

User talk:DrGaryWebb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sbrools 22:21, 23 December 2006 (UTC)User Sbrools needs to stop bitching and start reading.[reply]

And I'll add -- Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Broux 03:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)User Broux needs to stop warning people and start educating himself.[reply]

I have not violated the NPOV policy. Please visit my user page to learn more about me and my background.DrGaryWebb 19:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Dear Sir, please help. I've done a LOT of work to try to provide an objective page on Patriarchy. I'm a postgrad student working in a related area. I think I'm caught in a trap. Patriarchy is used objectively in Anthropology and Sociobiology but it has obviously become a jargon word in Feminism. Maybe my mistake is to believe I can present both uses in the one article. Some feminist readers, I think understandably, feel that the objective uses don't do justice to their usage. In their usage patriarchy is immoral by definition. I'm hoping that time will bring more people to discuss things calmly, but I'm anxious. One reader simply deleted all reference to Steven Goldberg and matriarchy references, without discussion and despite everything being referenced. Any advice? Any encouragement? Anything I'm doing wrong? Cheers and thanks. Alastair Haines 08:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Postgraduate students are treated very poorly on wikipedia; they allow the most ignorant people you can imagine to edit your article. I have never had any discussions with those who have edited my work; editing is what they call it; although, it then makes your contribution wrong after they change it up and add false information. I would suggest that you only deal with it as best you can, for as long as you can, then go to a source where they do not allow editing by the most ignorant among us. I would suggest you go to a web site where they do not allow such things to happen. =+=+ Sorry.

WikiProject Sociology Newsletter: II (April 2010)

[edit]
Sociology ProjectNews • April 2010

The Sociology WikiProject is conducting a roll call (or min-census, if you prefer). More then five years down the road, we have over 50 members, but we don't know how many of them are still active in the sociology area. If you are or want to become once again an active contributor to the sociology content on Wikipedia, please move your name from the inactive to the active list on our roll call.

In other news, we have reactivated the newsletter :) At least, for this announcement. We also have a new, automated to do listing, an active tag and assess project (which has identified about 1,800 sociology articles on Wikipedia, and assessed about 1,3000 of them), and three new userboxes for your self-identification pleasure :) On a final note, I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions.

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a participant at WikiProject Sociology. • signed Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sociology Newsletter: III (December 2010)

[edit]
Sociology ProjectNews • December 2010
Spreading the meme since August 2006

The Sociology WikiProject third newsletter is out!

According to our April mini-census, we have 15 active members, 6 semi-active ones and 45 inactive. Out of those, 4 active, 3 semi-active and 1 inactive members have added themselves to corresponding categories since the mini-census. The next one is planned, roughly, for sometime next year. The membership list has been kept since 2004.

On that note, nobody has ever studied WikiProjects from the sociological perspective... if you are interesting in researching Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Research and wiki-research-l listerv.

Moving from research to teaching, did you know that many teachers and instructors are teaching classes with Wikipedia? This idea is getting support from the Wikimedia Foundation, and some really useful tools have been created recently. I have experience with that, having taught several undergad classes, so feel free to ask me questions on that!

And as long as I am talking about professional issues, if any of you is going to any sociological conferences, do post that to our project - perhaps other members are going there too?

In other news: the a automated to do listing reported in the April issue went down shortly afterwards, but seems to be on the path to reactivation. We still have an active tag and assess project, and comparing the numbers to the April report, we have identified about 350 more sociology-related articles (from 1,800 to 2,150) and assessed about 100 (from 1,300 to 1,400).

We now have a listing of most popular sociology-related pages. It is updated on the 1st of every month, starting with August, and reports which of our sociology-tagged articles are most frequently read. Of course, GIGO holds true, so after looking at it right now and trying to determine what is our most popular article, my first action was to shake my head and remove Criminal Minds (which, perhaps not too surprisingly, outranks all sociology articles in period tested). Second item I noticed it this month's Industrial Revolution, beating Criminal Minds, that moved from close to 30th position in August/September, to 9th in October and 2nd in November. If you'd like to discuss this or any other trends, please visit WT:SOCIOLOGY!

Finally, with the reactivation of Article Alerts, we are getting our own here. Bookmark that page so you can keep track of sociology related deletion debates, move debates, good and feature article discussions, and more.

Our first task force (Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology/Social movements task force) was created (1 June 2010).

If you have basic or better graphic skills, our projects needs a dedicated barnstar (award) (currently the closest we can get is the Society Barnstar.

As always, I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions.

Authored by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC) [reply]


You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a recipient of WikiProject Sociology Newsletter (Opt-out).