User talk:Drachentöter001
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Drachentöter001! I noticed your contributions to Tughril-class frigate and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, please read what is and what isn't vandalism WP:NOTV. You reverted edits from 3 different users including me and 2 different IPs, that were good faith edits. — hako9 (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Hako9:. I know it's not vandalism, and didn't claim I reverted vandalism, but unconstructive edits. So please check what I reverted (three editors, of whom the IP made a very unconstructive edit, please check their contributions, with wholesale removal of content on a large number of articles), and changed (changing to what the body of the article says), before accusing me of not knowing what vandalism is... Drachentöter001 (talk) 08:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- First, labelling them unconstructive edits means you think it is vandalism. Second, those weren't content removal. In fact, those were good faith edits. Add incompetence and policy ignorance to the accusation. — hako9 (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- "Unconstructive" isn't synonymous with "vandalism", "vandalism" is a deliberate destructive act while "unconstructive edits" often are made simply because of not knowing how Wikipedia works. The IP seems to believe that content being tagged as "vague", "dead link" or "citation needed" means that it not only can be removed but should be removed, and is also ignoring, or oblivious of, the many warnings/notes they have received because of their editing. And is making a very large number of such edits, some of their edits also seem to remove content simply because of them not liking it, which makes their editing disruptive. So I know what I'm doing, probably at least as well as you do, so stop trying to lecture me... Drachentöter001 (talk) 10:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- First, labelling them unconstructive edits means you think it is vandalism. Second, those weren't content removal. In fact, those were good faith edits. Add incompetence and policy ignorance to the accusation. — hako9 (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)