User talk:DragonKing22

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, DragonKing22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!--Lionratz (talk) 12:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey[edit]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Great!

NoRwEgIaNbAcTeRiUm (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GKIDS[edit]

What do you think you're doing? Were all of these movies distributed by GKIDS? --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 23:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Amp71 (talk) 23:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to talk page messages[edit]

If someone asks you something here on your talk page you can either reply right underneath or click on the "talk" part of the signature and post on there page. Nobody Ent 01:11, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not very nice. Almost right? You know well, GKIDS has nothing to do with them. --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 23:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lilo & Stitch: The Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Sanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Masashi Ando, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Only Yesterday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who the Fuck is staking me on here?![edit]

I want to know who is staking me and deleating my edits to pages when I have the awnsers from the sites you should know by now. I saw what animated films MGM distributes on MGM.com and IMDb, put them in Category: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Animated films and the distribution section in MGM Animation. Then out of freakin nowhare, some hack deleateds them fast than saying Jack Robinson. Also I put The Castle of Calgistro in the Studio Ghibli category on this site, next three days its gone and it must be the same hack who is doing this me. Who ever it is!?! Stop right now or I am calling the police.

I'M THE FRICK WHO'S STALKING YOU, IDIOT JERKOFF — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.168.31.172 (talk) 20:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kazuyoshi Katayama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sentimental Journey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Producted" is not a word. --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 12:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hayao Miyazaki, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rashomon, Yojimbo and Kenichi Yoshida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jimmie Haskell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Land of the Lost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Robot Communications. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of film director and composer collaborations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Master (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Koichi Chiba, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Koichi Chiba" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 00:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Satoshi Kon may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phillip Ingram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Follow Your Heart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roger Ebert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wolf of Wall Street (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akio Sugino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cat's Eye. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akio Sugino for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akio Sugino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akio Sugino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Williams (songwriter) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding categories and company names[edit]

Please don't add companies that have minor role in the production of an anime work (for example production assistance for some episodes). Raamin (talk) 19:40, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isao Takahata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best Animated Feature. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Bergeaud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Earth2. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Adelaide Productions, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 99.46.224.17 (talk) 19:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:32EE:110:88AC:5EBD:B09B:947 (talk) [reply]

Fox Television Animation[edit]

If you want to keep that page from getting deleted, then find proper references to keep it from getting deleted. King Shadeed 21:23, May 26, 2015 (UTC)

@King Shadeed Look, I don't know why you keep bullying me at deleting my works of art and think I am a threat to you but I found about Fox Television Animation at this link (https://www.linkedin.com/company/fox-television-animation) okay. Also one of these days Sony Pictures Animation will absorb Adelaide Productions' library as their own once Sony Pictures Animation gets in the television industry and I will show you I am right and your wrong. SO STOP BEING A SMART SHOW OFF ON ME!!!

It's called "sourcing properly". And you only found once source for "Fox Television Animation" and you have no proof that SPA will fold Adelaide Productions into their division. And it's also called "follow the rules". King Shadeed 14:06, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

@King Shadeed ALL RIGHT!!! Also the real reason why I keep putting Adelaide Productions in SPA's box is because you let other users do this stuff and also I didn't say SPA will fold Adelaide Productions as my proof, I said someday and also I put it in See Also for people to see the other Sony Pictures Animation studio. I only said that someday SPA will fold Adelaide Productions because you kind not allowing me put Adelaide's box when I was going to give people a link to another Sony Pictures Animation studio to see what cause Sony to make their own feature film studio. I also made that See Also in that Sony Pictures Animation box and if you don't want me to put it there fine! I have made a document of Sony Pictures Animation and Adlaide being partners do to they are Sony Pictures' only animation studios in my Academy Awards scrapbook of events, studio's filmography and directors to producers' filmography. I just though I would let people see a box that contain Sony's only animation studios and what cause Sony to do animated feature films.

No. Don't make assumptions, don't be skeptic, and I don't let other users do stuff like that, so don't get it twisted. Sony Pictures Animation is for motion pictures; Adelaide Productions is television. The two sources that were found for Adelaide says it was founded in 1993. SPA was launched nine years later. If YOU would take the time-out to look up reliable references, then you wouldn't have to WORRY about vandalizing! Right or wrong? King Shadeed 18:47, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

@King Shadeed Fine, fine, fine. Which brings me to my big question, what is Adelaide Productions doing and what is going on there and with them? We haven't heard any news from them since the series finale of The Boondocks and they could be planing to shut down or maybe get absorb into Sony Pictures Animation since SPA announced a Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs TV series with DMX Media. I tried looking up the news for them but nothing is coming up for Adelaide Productions. If you can find any news of what they are doing and if they are still alive, I need to know. Because they have not announced any new animated shows in today's news for what I know, unless they will be announcing anything at this year's Comic Con, I am total cool. Let us see and wait if they will be at this year's Comic-Con to announce anything new and then we will see if their fate is alive or folded. Deal?

STOP with your assumptions and no deal! Adelaide is still active. Right now, it's an in-name-only division of Sony Pictures Television.

Now, pay attention: source #1 and source #2. If you would look at the name "Steve Mosko" under the site at "Bizapedia", you would see that he's the president. Why? He's the president under SPT. Even CorporationWiki will give you the same details. All television companies under SPT will fall under HIS name. Plus, like I said, Adelaide was founded in 1993. Under whom? Columbia Pictures Television. SPT has a lot of names that are still active as in-name-only. Your assumptions won't help you at all. Do you understand NOW?? King Shadeed 23:34, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

@King Shadeed Yes I understand okay. But Sony Pictures Television has still not given us news of a new animated show. I will be waiting for their new animated to come out and someday in the future SPA will be partners with Adelaide Productions when the time comes for SPA to do Television and SPA will also distribute Adelaide's library on TV and DVD in the future too . I won't put Adelaide in SPA's box anymore and just pretend that SPA distributes Adelaide's library in my Academy Awards scrapbook okay. We good?

Look, I'm done with this. There's no point on me going further trying to get this through your head! SPT OWNS Adelaide Productions. It's THEIR division. Ever since Jumanji: The Series first aired, who was responsible for it? Columbia TriStar Television. You STILL missed the whole POINT of this! If you DID, we wouldn't keep going. And WHY would SPA distribute Adelaide's library, when SPT handles all distribution of the Sony Pictures theatrical output on television?? SPT handles television distribution from their movie divisions: Columbia Pictures, Screen Gems, Sony Pictures Classics, Sony Pictures Animation, TriStar Pictures, Triumph Films, Destination Films, Stage 6 Films, and Affirm Films. SPHE handles distribution of SPE's movie and television libraries. Read the sources properly. Do a company history. Like I said, I'm done with this! If YOU get blocked, THAT'S on you! King Shadeed 09:30, May 28, 2015 (UTC)

May 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. You were warned before about your disruptive editing on the Template:Sony Pictures Animation and the Template:Blue Sky Studios without properly adding sources to their pages. King Shadeed 14:28, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

June 2015[edit]

Regarding your recent edits to {{Blue Sky Studios}}: Fox Interactive isn't an animation studio, so there's no reason it should be included. Trivialist (talk) 02:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Trivialist Look! Video Games are like animation and the original video games by them are like movies or shows. I don't know where you came from but can't you let my edits be left alone by you people. Also if it is in the See Also which means it is similar to the company's style. This site is suppose to be a fun site to edit stuff and can't I just have my edits be left alone because they are almost right and the proof is right in front of your guys' faces.

This site isn't "suppose to be a fun site to edit stuff," it's an encyclopedia that aims for correctness, not being "almost right."

Game studios and animation studios have some similarities, but that isn't reason enough to automatically list every game studio that's related to an animation studio. For example, MGM Interactive and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Animation have little in common other than a common corporate parent. If you can show that they've worked together on some things, then a "see also" link might be in order. Otherwise, you're just listing MGM divisions, and {{MGM}} already does that. Trivialist (talk) 22:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, game studios and animation studios are not the same thing. Blue Sky and Fox Interactive, and Illumination and Universal Interactive, really have nothing in common other than the same corporate parents. Trivialist (talk) 02:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Trivialist You Know What Fine!! FUCK YOU!!!! I hope you and and that King Shadeed smart ass and douchbag ffrom New Jersey burn in hell!! Because I was just having some fun and was trying to be right for once in my life by having and making some connection. Weird Al is right! Wikipedia does suck!!!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. First of all, you can't condemn anyone telling them to "go to Hell". Second of all, you need to get your facts straight, and lastly, I got on you last month about your vandalism edits. Obviously, you don't know when to quit! If YOU say "Wikipedia sucks", then by all means, let the door knob hit ya where the good Lord split ya! You're not hurting us, you're hurting yourself! King Shadeed 23:58, June 22, 2015 (UTC)

@King Shadeed Fine! Just get me out of here and let me be with Anime News Network and some of IMDb where I can find better cool guys and not ones that picky and snobbish like you. New Jersey sucks!

You're welcome to leave on your own free terms. You can call us petty names all you want, but it's not getting you anywhere. When you're at wiki sites, you can't vandalize. You have to get your reference materials together and source them properly. King Shadeed 09:39, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

@King Shadeed Good! Just tell me how delete my account so I can get away from you and Trivialist's harassment and abuse. You two have made a powerful and unstoppable enemy once I find who your identities are and if you even come to Washington state. I will destroy you guys' life once I find your identities and you know what I am strong and powerful than you and I am not vandalizing pages like everyone else is on this site, just doing what anyone would do.

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.

Obviously, if you haven't watched the news on what went on in Charleston, SC. You should think before you act. And just for making that threat, I'm not going to show you how to deactivate your account. How about that?? King Shadeed 14:09, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

July 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Adelaide Productions, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You were warned before about your vandalism on that page, but it just don't seem to get it THROUGH you! Unless you don't want to get yourself blocked, I suggest you quit while you're ahead! King Shadeed 22:34, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bsa dow ski1 03:49, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of film director and composer collaborations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Father's Day (film) and Junior (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When you add links to List of film director and composer collaborations, or any other article for that matter, please take the time to check that the link takes the reader to a relevant article. I have had to check over this article multiple times to fix links that were pointing to incorrect targets. Your cooperation in keeping Wikipedia accurate and useful would be most appreciated. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pixar and Chrono Cross[edit]

Why is it you keep adding the Pixar template to Chrono Cross? They had no hand in making any part of that game. Sergecross73 msg me 21:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergecross73 Because I read online that Pixar was credited for doing some work on this game! The credits of the game said so to on this website (https://www.chronocompendium.com/Term/Chrono_Cross_Credits.html) and IMDb said this too. If any Wikipedia user has the game they need to see if this true. I got it from websites like IMDb and Chrono Compendium that said PIXAR did some work on it.

Yes, but the word "Pixar" is merely listed under "Staff Coordinator". I don't know exactly what that's supposed to mean, but I don't think it means what you think it means. They're not credited for making the videos or anything. If anything, I wonder if they provided some sort of art tools or something, as it says "artist tools" directly above it. Or maybe it refers to a different, unrelated Pixar. Regardless, its certainly not a Pixar Creation in the same vein as Toy Story or their Cars/Planes stuff. Sergecross73 msg me 14:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mune: Guardian of the Moon[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mune: Guardian of the Moon, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.eddy.tv/work/628/mune-the-guardian-of-the-moon.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Brave Fighter of Sun Fighbird[edit]

Fighbird is not animated by Tatsunoko Productions, at least it is not the main studio, it's animated by Sunrise like the rest of the Brave series by Takara toys.

January 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Paramount Animation‎. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carniolus (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Carniolus okay king of the Wikipedia Nazis.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Warcraft (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sailor Moon Super S: The Movie[edit]

Please don't add categories which don't belong, as you did here. Thanks! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mo' Money[edit]

How is Mo' Money a Saturday Night Live film? I'm not being sarcastic; I genuinely don't know how it's connected to SNL and am curious. Thanks! Trivialist (talk) 20:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, do you mean this? Other than using the phrase "mo' money," the movie and Wayans' monologue are completely different. Trivialist (talk) 20:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cartoon Network original programming[edit]

Please provide some explanation when changing dates in an article or template. See WP:KIDSTVDATES. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 23:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit summary

If I find who you are, I am going to punch you in the god damn face Mr. Travialist!!!

Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia.
It's spelled Trivialist.

Also, please provide references or explanations for your changes; otherwise they're indistinguishable from vandalism and likely to be reverted. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 01:14, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Trivialist Well fuck you Trivialist! I am done with this moutherfucker website you call perfect and you can shove it up your ass!!! The evidence and sources are right in your god damn face on this god damn website you prick!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonKing22 (talk • contribs) 01:34, August 31, 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2016[edit]

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

News and notes: AffCom still grappling with WMF Board's criteria for new chapters

Special report: Olympics readership depended on language

In the media: Librarians, Wikipedians, and a library of Wikipedia coverage

WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia

Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between

Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit

Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them

Recent research: One study encounters critique of its ethics from Wikipedians; another critiques the ethics employed by Wikipedia

Blog: Upload of free photos from Swiss library underway

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 16:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, DragonKing22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Template:Studio Ghibli[edit]

The "Other productions" section was removed because Studio Ghibli didn't actually do anything other than assist the studio making the works by doing some of the grunt labor. They do this to bring in $$$ in between releases. They are not listed as producing the works, so those should not be listed on the template. It's fine to list them in the article(s) because they did work on them, but they are not the producing studio. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.

I've warned you a year and a half ago about your behavior by attacking people by calling people names but obviously you've failed to comprehend. King Shadeed 14:22, January 25, 2017 (UTC)

DragonKing22, I appreciate this edit, but if you attack people again, as you did on the talkpage, you may be blocked from editing. Bishonen | talk 22:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Nippon Animation/Japan Taps[edit]

Good day. I saw that in the article on Nippon Animation the anime Miracle Girls is listed as one of their works, produced under the name of Japan Taps. I found many sources giving Japan Taps as the Studio, but no other to connect it with Nippon Animation. Since you were the one who added it, I thought you could help me out. Do you happen to have any sources for it? Regards. Gelonidres (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Interactive[edit]

The Vivendi Games page clearly states that Universal Interactive merged with Havas to form Vivendi Universal Games. Vivendi Universal Games is a different legal entity from Universal Interactive. Universal Interactive as a brand ceased to exist after Crash Nitro Kart. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 10:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I did some further research, and it turns out that Vivendi acquired Universal Interactive through their acquisition of Seagram entertainment assets. Universal Interactive was absorbed and reformed into Vivendi Universal Games, whilst Universal Interactive was maintained as a publishing label until Crash Nitro Kart. Havas Conseli on the other hand was renamed as Vivendi Universal Publishing, a division for Vivendi Universal Games. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 11:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Iftekharahmed96 You know what FINE!! I am done with this motherfucking website and it's the last straw. I quite being this stupid website's editor and will be more focusing as an editor for IMDb and Anime News Network. I will still come to Wikipedia but not as editor. Good Day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonKing22 (talk • contribs) 18:14, June 17, 2017 (UTC)

Louis Ashbourne Serkis[edit]

Please add sources asap or it is likely to be deleted. Imdb is not an acceptable source. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Louis Ashbourne Serkis[edit]

The article Louis Ashbourne Serkis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources except imdb, which is specifically banned in WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Working actor, but doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fox Television Animation[edit]

Before reverting my redirect of Fox Television Animation, please help by providing other editors with an explanation. There are many reasons why the article should be a redirect.

The subject is simply not important enough.
The studio mostly works in assisting other studios, rather than creating shows on its own.
There is no helpful content here that cannot be included in 20th Century Fox Animation.

Finally, it seems to me that you do not engage much on talk pages; I urge you to become more involved. Talking out disagreements and problems like these is what makes Wikipedia work. Bruzer Fox 06:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DragonKing22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dink, Hanna Barbera[edit]

Hey there, re: these changes, you probably noticed that I reverted your edits. Nothing personal, but I'd appreciate if you could please provide a reputable source for this content. My attempts to verify the claim by looking at closing credits on YouTube only led me to highly dubious videos where the Hanna Barbera logo is of a far lower quality than the rest of the video and appears to be tacked on. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 03:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also please read WP:OVERLINK and Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Categorization#General categorization. MarnetteD|Talk 03:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikia is not a reliable source WP:USERG AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD & AngusWOOF Go to hell you smart asses! Also the proof is right in front of your faces on other websites you ass wipes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonKing22 (talk • contribs) 00:40, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Wikia isn't proof of anything. Also you're never gonna be taken seriously if you're just going to act like a child and throw a tantrum when people disagree with you. Bruzer Fox 05:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruzer Fox You know what, screw this I quiet! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonKing22 (talk • contribs) 05:52, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1][2] I've already contacted you about the assertion that Hanna-Barbera was involved in Dink, which you did not reply to. Please do not resubmit this content again without proof. Oh, and since I'm just now noting the comments above, please avoid personal attacks. It is commonplace for editors to ask for references. If you can't handle this, they you might consider another hobby. References include mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy, like news sites, commercially published books, etc. User-generated sites like Wikia, IMDb, TV.com, TV Tropes, Wikipedia, etc. are insufficient. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb SHUT UP! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonKing22 (talk • contribs) 00:41, May 14, 2018 (UTC)

So long as you adhere to the warnings above, start adding proper references, and avoid personal attacks, I'd be happy to shut up. If you can't do any of that, your editing privileges will be interrupted. This is a community project and you have to have a basic ability to cooperate with others, sorry. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros. Animation[edit]

Just wanted to apologize for this revert here [3] -- I misread the diff and mistakenly thought you were removing content, not adding content back in. I agree that the material should be on the list. Thanks, 青い(Aoi) (talk) 18:40, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 23:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Your addition to Dead Kids has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. SanAnMan (talk) 22:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Adventure Time[edit]

Heads up about this edit: The original quote is "an AT movie was never officially announced." As such, "[Adventure Time]" is being used as an explicitly clear editorial change, replacing "AT". Directly changing the quote to read "an Adventure Time movie..." violates the policy on original wording.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:47, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unproduced Warner Bros. Animation Projects[edit]

So many things on the list of unproduced Warner Bros. Animation projects are unsourced. But why? I'm just curious. --Mr.P (CHAT LOG) 17:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.P Sigh! I found some of the info at this website called Copyright Encyclopedia. Here are the links for them and please don't delete the things I made.

http://www.copyrightencyclopedia.com/the-snow-queen-by-four-star-films-inc-king-tut-bluebeard/, http://www.copyrightencyclopedia.com/a-hideous-history-of-weapons-by-cherney-berg-illustrator/#id1014878, http://www.copyrightencyclopedia.com/quest-for-camelot-opening-title-and-cues-composed-by/#id5781778. Also again please don't delete the films I put there because I worked so hard to find these lost films and that website is the only source I can find for them. Also for Catwoman: The Animated Series I found at http://www.worldsfinestonline.com/WF/sections/backstage/abandoned/ while the rest that have no sources were by other users. Also please don't delete the page for Unproduced Warner Bros. Animation Projects because it was a hard Wikipedia page to make and find stuff for it.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DragonKing22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DragonKing22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Aoi (青い) (talk) 03:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I almost didn't get the polite comment you left me at Template talk:Animation industry in the United States‎. In the future, when you want to ping someone, please remember that the post must be signed with four tildes (~) or the person won't receive the message. Just a note for the future. =) Happy editing! Aoi (青い) (talk) 03:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@talk PISS OFF!!! I am so done with this mother fucking website after what I am seeing on the site with stupid edits and stuff. I am just done and one day I am going to make a website that is even better than this shit hole of a place!

November 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for gross incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will be happy to unblock you if you apologize and agree to strike or delete your offensive comments. I realize we all have bad days, but this is not acceptable and I am sure you know that. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ Ad Orientem {{unblock|reason=I am so sorry for my behavior and promise it won't happen again. I have been jobless for three years and get bored easily. Also, to Aoi, Sony does not own 20th Century Fox, since it is not been fully bought by Disney, it is still independent. Also I was cranky when this happen and promises this won't happen again. So, let us go back to where we where please;}} -DragonKing22 (talk) 27 November 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DragonKing22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am so sorry for my behavior and promise it won't happen again. I have been jobless for three years and get bored easily. Also, to Aoi, Sony does not own 20th Century Fox, since it is not been fully bought by Disney, it is still independent. Also I was cranky when this happen and promises this won't happen again. So, let us go back to where we where please; -DragonKing22 (talk) 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Happily done. Welcome back. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DragonKing22: I understand why you moved the listing now -- I thought the listing I was reverting to was in alphabetical order and did not realize it was listed under Sony. I've listed it separately at Template:Animation_industry_in_the_United_States, and I hope my edit is OK with you. Thanks for your civil comment, I do appreciate it. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:10, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've copied and pasted your unblock request and formatted it so the unblock template would work; I hope this is OK with you. In any case, the block is set to expire in a couple of hours so you should be able to edit at that time regardless. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at List of video games notable for negative reception, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Laser brain (talk) 04:57, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Laser brain (talk) LISTEN NUMNUTS I DELETED THOSE CAUSE THEY DID NOT HAVE GOOD SOURCES FOR THEM!!! ALSO GO AHEAD AND BLOCK ME BECAUSE I SO DONE WITH THIS MOTHER FUCKING WEBSITE SEE HOW IT IS BEING RUN NOW!!! FUCK YOU FOREVER!!!

January 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Electricburst1996. Your recent edit to the page Sanrio appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 06:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The New Tom and Jerry Motion Picture[edit]

To avoid competition with the filming dates of the new live-action/animated Tom and Jerry feature film at Warner Bros. Studios, Leavesden, could you either contact or visit the Warner Bros. Studios in Burbank, California, and ask Warner Bros. Animation president Sam Register if he could plan on making any direct-to-video feature-length sequel to Tom and Jerry: The Movie (1992) as a dedication to the memory of Charlotte Rae, with the soon-to-come returning voice talents of Richard Kind as Tom and Anndi McAfee as Robyn Starling for example? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.57.136 (talk) 17:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@(User talk:68.224.57.136) Do it yourself you jackass!!

I'm not jackass, and I never even turn into a donkey over this request. I'm trying to be respectful to other Wikipedia users after learning my lessons from being blocked because of my persistent editing, vandalism, edit warring and my other actions in the past. If you don't like me, I'll have to talk to the Wikipedia administrators one by one. You may not like me asking questions, but I will not be insulted by you any longer, just because I'm curious, and it doesn't mean that I am wrong.

May 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at TMS Entertainment, you may be blocked from editing. Hmm unexplained re-insertion of an obvious violation of WP:EL. Drmies (talk) 00:19, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies (talk) Well FUCK YOU MOTHERFUCKER AND DROP DEAD!!!

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Weathering with You. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Masum Reza^📞 08:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Masum Reza^📞 09:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:DragonKing22, when you get back online, please read and reply to the noticeboard thread at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attacks_and_incivility_by_User:DragonKing22. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 14:52, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DragonKing22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"I am sorry for my behavior and promise I will be a better editor. I won't do it again and promise I will change"

Decline reason:

This is exactly what you said last time. Following that unblock you resumed uncivil outbursts and disruptive editing. No thanks. Laser brain (talk) 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Laser brain (talk) So how long do I have to be unblocked from Wikipedia then?!? You will be sorry if you have problems without me.

You are blocked indefinitely, which is to say, until you can craft a convincing unblock request that would persuade an administrator to unblock you. --Laser brain (talk) 21:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Laser brain (talk) Fine! I quiet and want nothing to do with this now uncool website anymore! I want my account to be delete! {{db-user}}@DragonKing22. Good luck without me helping your website.

I've deactivated your deletion request. We do not delete user talk pages except under very unusual circumstances, and there is no way to delete an account. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) Well I am so sorry if I am not a good Wikipedia user like you or the other guy, I still want to end my account and I am calling quiets being a Wikipedia user! I think we are both good without each other and I am a better editor on IMDb, Anime News Network and the Fandom Wikis. Let's see how good you do without me with the pages I made for this site!

Sometimes calling it quiets is the best we can hope for.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DragonKing22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"I know I have been a jerk and had some tough days. I promise I will be better and I swear on the cross. If you want to ban me for life I am good with it and I will delete my account if you would let me edit again so I can do it. If you want me to come back I will be a better editor I swear, if not I will be spending more time on IMDb or Anime News Network then this site. So do you want me to stay or be gone forever? Your choice".

Decline reason:

Your previous unblock request was declined and I don't see any new information that would lead us to believe that you have a plan for avoiding the sort of problems you were previously blocked for. Also, you made it clear that you weren't interested in editing, so this change of heart within a few minutes is a bit confusing and seems like a timesucking plea for attention. Please don't fill out any more unblock requests as they will be ignored and your talk page will be locked. If you choose to respond, please do so below.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fine! I will officially quite and I am so done with this dumb website! I would like my account to be gone now! You have made yourself a powerful future enemy! Good riddance losers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonKing22 (talk • contribs) 02:30, June 7, 2019 (UTC)

And that's pretty much what you said the last time around, and in late 2018, so I guess we're done here, since you haven't demonstrated any ability to control your hostility. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said earlier, there is no way to delete an account, we just don't have that function in the software. We'd do it if we could, but it's just technically not possible. If you want to quit(e) and never use your account again, then just don't use it, and nobody will bother you.

Alternatively, we would gladly welcome you back if you can convince us (by "us" I mean the Wikipedia community, not just the few people who have been commenting here) that this won't happen again. You saying you won't do it again isn't good enough, because that's exactly what you said the last time, and here we are. We need to know, in your own words, that you understand that this is a collaborative project, that you are REQUIRED to treat ALL other editors with respect, and that responding to simple questions by telling people to fuck off and die is not only absolutely unacceptable, it also drives people interested in editing away from Wikipedia, which does a lot more damage to the project than blocking you from editing. We would rather have the 47 editors asking constructive questions of you on this page do something better with their time than have you telling them all to fuck off in all caps. You understand?

Since your talk page access has been disabled, if you want to think about this and try a more sincere unblock request, you'll have to do it through WP:UTRS. Feel free to take your time, we won't be going anywhere. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]