User talk:Dramaqueen6999

Welcome!

Hello, Dramaqueen6999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Milburn (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity[edit]

Hi. It should be pretty clear that you don't come in and put a highly and obviously one-sided comment in the second sentence of an article. It is unnecessary, non-neutral and does not belong in the article lead. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 19:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Message on my talk page[edit]

Could you please slow down? You seem to just be undoing edits at random. If you're removing information, it is best to explain why- undoing good faith edits without comment is considered very bad practice- you may find yourself blocked. J Milburn (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What, reverting random edits? J Milburn (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reverting stuff... where did my userpage go? Dramaqueen6999 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Korn deleted it as it appeared to be there simply for shock value- Wikipedia is not your personal soapbox. Back to the subject of your reversions, you seem to be struggling to differentiate between vandalism and good faith editing and attempts to improve the encyclopedia; that's alright, we all make mistakes, but just try to be a little more careful- only revert obvious rubbish. Looking at your contributions, this edit is exactly the kind of thing that should be reverted- it's obvious vandalism. With other things, you need to be more careful. Unless it's obvious vandalism, explain why you are making the reversion. You can contact me on my talk page if you need any help. J Milburn (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Dramaqueen6999 (talk) 19:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User page[edit]

I have deleted your userpage as it contained nothing but shock imagery. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 19:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well that wasn't very nice of you. I'll forgive you though because i have the codes saved and i can just put them back in a minute. i forgive you. you made a mistake and have admitted it. Dramaqueen6999 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is gone and I have protected your userpage so you can't recreate it. If you feel like productive editing, let me know and I shall unprotect it. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 19:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But Wikipedai isn't censored. Dramaqueen6999 (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's also not your personal soapbox- we're not here to do our best to be offensive, and that kind of userpage makes collaborative editing difficult. J Milburn (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but i don't understand - i wasn't self-promoting, recruiting, advertising? Dramaqueen6999 (talk) 19:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say it was. It was unnecessarily offensive, obviously there just to make a point and detracts from communication to the extent it could be considered disruptive. J Milburn (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but i wasn't trying to make a pint. i just didn't particually like the userboxes available and there wern't any for some of the stuff about me that i would want other users to know, so i made my own. Dramaqueen6999 (talk) 19:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your recent contributions have been a mix of constructive and non-constructive edits. Please review all the things that different Wikipedia users have been trying to say to you today (now collected below). Please also know that when we get around to it, we can see all your edits in one place at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dramaqueen6999, which is a page you cannot blank as easily as this talk page. KevinCuddeback (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Love in This Club. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. J Milburn (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Virgin birth of Jesus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 19:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding Gus to the past characters list, he's not gone yet. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes and additions of random text to the History of Estonia were not constructive edits. Please use the Wikipedia:Sandbox to practice making edits to the Wikipedia. KevinCuddeback (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]