User talk:Dravrah2012

November 2017

Hello, I'm Jd22292. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Curtis J. Raynold, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Curtis J. Raynold, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 03:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 04:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Curtis J. Raynold

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Curtis J. Raynold, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you..

November 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Curtis J. Raynold. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]