User talk:Drpaulgleason

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Drpaulgleason, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Dan56. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page ¡Dos!‎, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:ALBUM#Critical reception, there is a 10 review limit for the ratings template, and the notability of the review sources should be considered. In general, the most reliable source(s) on a particular topic should be used. The review source you added is not used by either Metacritic or AnyDecentMusic?, nor WP:ALBUMS/REVSITE. If an album did not receive enough reviews from mainstream critics to write a sufficient "critical reception" section, then lesser known critics may be used. Dan56 (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Cellar Magazine and conflict of interest[edit]

I strongly urge you to stop adding reviews by Rock Cellar Magazine. As stated above, indie reviews may sometimes be included, but linking to your own reviews or to a magazine which you are affiliated with presents a conflict of interest and is considered spam. You'll probably want to go back and revert your edits as well. Woodroar (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]