User talk:Dthem 2000

License tagging for Image:Constance Hopkins.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Constance Hopkins.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Hugh de Stafford, 2nd Earl of Stafford[edit]

Guess we were editing at the same time Noles1984 14:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eberhard AKA Evrard[edit]

Looks like we have some common research... Care to merge?

(Sjcarpediem 06:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

you requested contact[edit]

Hello. (and next time, you shoudl use the discussion page, not the bio page. thnx.)

How can we help one another?

Sjcarpediem 18:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

awkward pause[edit]

The thing has already been done... Another wikipedian responded to my request for advice on the matter and handled the technicalities behind it. You are very welcome to invesigate the current article Eberhard of Friuli now redirects to Evrard (you can read the discussion page to learn the identity of the helpful wikipedian, or just above your own entry on my discussion page...).

Sjcarpediem 18:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sundehul[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have deleted the Rotrude of Trier-Charles Martel marriage based on ancestry error. I guess that must have been quite a mix-up there. I'm using the really helpful Foundation of Medieval Genealogy website for references, loads of information there. I'm trying to figure out whose woman was actually married to Charles and had issue from. I'm still trying to figure out whose parents were Rotrude's since the named Chrodobertus II is nowhere founded in the FMG site. Anyway, welcome back to the states (reading your bio). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sundehul (talk • contribs).

8.23.2007: Thank you for your message. I learned that The Royal Ancestry Bible Royal Ancestors of 300 Colonial American Families is not 100% reliable for all the information because the histories and timelines of these royal figures, especially the earliest ones, were sketchy or vague as it was put together from several genealogical sources made by other families who were descended from the royal figures and without corroborated historical sources from historians and researchers on the subject matters. The volumes are very helpful and informative, yes, but should be taken with a grain of salt. That's where the Foundation of Medieval Genealogy and the Peerage.com come in, the people behind these websites actually and thoroughly researched, corroborated, confirmed and compiled these royal and noble figures from long ago, as long as information said so or until new information from professional historians and scholars turn up to either confirm the information, contradict or reject it.

I am always looking out to make sure the right person was married to the right person and had issue with, even though information about them from so long ago is so sketchy or vague. Until then, all the historical information about these royal and noble figures we know now are all that we have.

Wanted to discuss more in depth via email instead of talk here? Let me know please. Regards, Sundehul

Richard fitzGilbert[edit]

Hi Don; how certain are you of the edit you made here[1]? I only ask, because Altschul, the best reference i have on the Clares, gives Richard's birthdate as 1035, and everything else i've seen, including the Foundation for Mediæval Genealogy and, i think, GEC, only say ante 1035. Is The Royal Ancestry... where it came from? Cheers, Lindsay 10:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bodegisel II[edit]

I am here based on your substantial edits to Arnulf of Metz‎. I have just put up Bodegisel II, (a poorly attested person connected with Arnulf), for deletion and would welcome anything you might add to the discussion. Thanks. Mdbrownmsw 15:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Chief Red Eagle grave site.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Constance Hopkins.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Constance Hopkins.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Sehoy III & Red Eagle sign.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sehoy III & Red Eagle sign.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. ✗plicit 13:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]