Jump to content

User talk:Dudewiththebling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello this is a test

Welcome!

Hello, Dudewiththebling, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kaini (talk) 23:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Black. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to IBM, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: IBM was changed by Dudewiththebling (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962083 on 2012-04-29T01:32:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Conservative Party of Canada, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dudewiththebling (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i learned my lesson and it wont happen again Dudewiththebling (talk) 00:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:14, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dudewiththebling (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand what i have been blocked for and i swear on my life that i will not cause any damage anymore and i will replace the damage with useful contributions

Decline reason:

You have to do more than just say that you understand the problem; you have to actually demonstrate it. Try again, and read the links that Bwilkins gave you above. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dudewiththebling (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i promise i will never vandalize wikipedia again and i will contribute greatly and i will demonstrate this if you give me a chance

Decline reason:

Nothing in this request is specific, so I am relying on contribution history- I do not see anything in this contribution history, or on this talk page, that supports the assertion that this account is being operated by a person with strong skills in research writing who is likely to make the encyclopedia better. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.