User talk:Dukedexter

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Bob talk 09:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Casey Jones Opening Credit.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Casey Jones Opening Credit.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Casey Jones Opening Credit.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Casey Jones Opening Credit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Wings Series Two Credits.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Wings Series Two Credits.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wings Series Two Credits.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wings Series Two Credits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grown up strange[edit]

Hello Dukedexter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Grown up strange for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gareth E Kegg (talk) 16:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the page to User:Dukedexter/Grown up strange to give you a bit of time to work on it. The important point is really to show how it meets our main inclusion standard, or this one aimed specifically at bands. More or less, Wikipedia summarizes information published in other places, so citing those other publications is critical to establishing that a topic is suitable for inclusion. For instance, magazine stories about the band, newspaper reviews, books, whatnot. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers, Wily D 20:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]