User talk:-tynjee

March 2022

Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you recently removed content from 1890s without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 10:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You cannot copy material from most non-Wikipedia sites into Wikipedia, even with attribution. I'd also recommend you take a step back from expanding in general since you seem to be making a lot of inappropriate tag removals, and copying random sections of text in from other articles without any context is often suboptimal. eviolite (talk) 03:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. I noticed that you recently removed content from Axel Sparre without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Copper in health into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Homeostasis DanCherek (talk) 13:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okay thank you :approve: Dulken (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hi Dulken, I'm Primefac. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Primefac (talk) 06:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dulken! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can you swear in Wikipedia?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Stop using edit summaries that are about yourself and not about what your edits do, or any other kind of silly or inappropriate edit summaries. If you carry on in the same way you are likely to be blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I second this remark. I've placed a standard warning template below, which relates to this. Dhtwiki (talk) 21:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Dhtwiki. I noticed that you recently removed content from Elementary arithmetic without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This editor's recent edit summary, in full, was "hi my name is carmen winstead" when removing 3+k of text. Dhtwiki (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You asked for it on the Discord. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 09:36, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LilianaUwU i did indeed do something silly. that is playing Cupcakke songs on a speaker at max volume in family home ball deletor. 09:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

help

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

-tynjee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 42.112.158.140. Also FPT is a *very common* ISP in Vietnam which isn't a VPN or something like that. Just a normal ordinary ISP. tynjee 12:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

https://fpt.vn/en/business/services/fpt-data-center.html was the issue. I've reduced it to a softblock. -- Amanda (she/her) 19:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser needed What is the issue with this IP? Can we grant an exemption here? Vanjagenije (talk) 16:46, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]