User talk:Dumenpro

This is Dumenpro's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: BUUNT (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Urban Versis 32 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BUUNT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 19:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dumenpro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 19:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Versis32!

I am not experienced enough, so I kindly ask for your advice what exactly would be correct to remove or to add. I tried to write as much as possible adhering to the style of Wikipedia. Dumenpro (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BUUNT (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Urban Versis 32 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BUUNT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:BUUNT[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:BUUNT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 21:02, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that at Draft talk:BUUNT you said that the draft was not unambiguously promotional. I can only wonder what you would consider to be unambiguously promotional in that case. The whole page, from start to finish, was a glowing accolade of its subject, written in the ludicrously gushing prose characteristic of the writings of marketing and advertising professionals. I don't think I could write anything more unambiguously promotional in tone and character if I tried. JBW (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please look again, I have already made several corrections removing words about uniqueness and other epithets. Jewelry production cannot be described without adjectives, it is an integral part of creativity. I read many similar articles on Wikipedia about jewelry brands and tried to write as similar as possible to them. Please specify errors in the text and I'll fix them. Dumenpro (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please read other stuff exists. That other similar articles exist does not mean that they are acceptable and good to use as a model. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us. We can only address what we know about. If you want to use other articles as a model, use those classified as good articles. If you want to help us out, feel free to identify these other articles you have seen for possible action.

Your draft is not salvageable. Any article about this company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. You used one source that was a sponsored post, meaning it was paid for by the company, that is not an independent source. The sources you use must be wholly unconnected with the company. This includes sources that are interviews with company personnel. Please read Your First Article. If there are no other sources, or only promotional pieces, the company would not merit an article at this time. 331dot (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Dumenpro, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dumenpro|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 21:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not payed at all. I try to cut the article as much as possible. Maybe it can work. Dumenpro (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a connection to the company? You didn't pick it at random to edit about. 331dot (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article because I'm trying to help my ukrainian friends to get on Wikipedia Dumenpro (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not a database of companies where existence merits inclusion, the company must be notable as I described above. Feel free to show these messages to your friends. 331dot (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for quick reply. I'm here first time, so no any experience. I read more and come back trying to publish it. Or maybe it's easier to create it on behalf of the owner of the company? Dumenpro (talk) 22:17, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't think the company is notable as Wikipedia defines it and it does not merit an article at this time. That doesn't mean forever, just not now. It's harder to create an article with a conflict of interest, not easier. 331dot (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Golden rule for an overview of what is required before a company can have an article on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Dumenpro (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Dumenpro! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, The article I wrote was rejected, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Dumenpro! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I need help to write a correct article., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]