User talk:Durikum18

Your edits[edit]

Hello! Please preview your edits before saving changes - your last edits to Thalaivankottai have been breaking the infobox, and one of the images that you attempted to add doesn't seem to exist. PohranicniStraze (talk) 12:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Create. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion notifications[edit]

This is to inform you that I've placed speedy deletion templates on two pages you've created, Category:Hindu Temple In Thalaivankottai and Category:Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai. It appears you are trying to write articles, but are creating them in the Category namespace in error. If you would like to dispute the speedy deletion, you may do so by using the "Contest this speedy deletion" button on the pages, but do not remove the speedy deletion notice from pages you created. Both pages are very unclear; I would recommend that you go through the articles for creation process to get feedback on any articles before publishing them. PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Contents/Technology and applied sciences, you may be blocked from editing. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thalaivankottai. ◢   Ganbaruby!   (remember to ping!) 15:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Inappropriate removal of speedy deletion tags. Per a complaint at WP:AIV. Please seek advice from experienced editors. If you continue on your present course, you may be permanently blocked from Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai[edit]

Hello, Durikum18,

Thank you for creating Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you created, Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai, is to hard to understand and read to remain published. The text needs to be improved. For example there are many words that start with capital letters. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article has been improved and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jonteemil (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai[edit]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Durikum18[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Durikum18 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Username⁶⁸⁹² 19:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu temples in thalaivankottai moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Hindu temples in thalaivankottai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The only cited source is not a usable source, and it doesn't verify any of the information in the article. Remember to only summarize what quality sources have said, and to cite them in your text.

– Thjarkur (talk) 22:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Username⁶⁸⁹² 01:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Putrukovil Festival Thalaivankottai moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Putrukovil Festival Thalaivankottai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jonteemil (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kashkumar16, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jonteemil (talk) 22:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Kashkumar16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Durikum18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kindly Unblock Me I Will Rectify My Mistake In Future I Will Not Do That Again Kindly Unblock &#9765902;&#9765900;

Decline reason:

You need to request unblock from your original account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Durikum18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kindly Unblock Me This is original account Unblock &#9765902;&#976590

Decline reason:

The oldest account in the SPI report is User:Kashkumar16, who edited in February before this account was created. You should log into Kashkumar16 and request unblock on that user's talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 03:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock request| 1=Kindly Unblock Me I Don’t Know Kashkumar16 Account Password Unblock &#9765902;&#9765900|

{{unblock request reason| =I Don’t Know Kashkumar16 Account Password Kindly Unblock My Account &#9765902;&#9765900|

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Durikum18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Don’t Know Kashkumar16 Account Password Kindly Unblock &#9767352;&#9765900

Decline reason:

No. Yamla (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hindu temples in Thalaivankottai[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hindu temples in Thalaivankottai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]