User talk:DusanTR

Welcome to Wikipedia.

Regarding the article Darko Trifunović. There was a discussion on the talk page which decided that it should be redirected to Report about Case Srebrenica. If you think something else should be done, please post a note on the talk page giving your reasons and we can discuss it. If you can convince others through discussion, then the redirect can be removed. If you simply post an article without discussion or consensus, then it will be removed and eventually you will have your account blocked. Please post a note one the talk page, and the issue can be discussed. But also note the previous discussion there.--Scott Mac 18:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr.Scott,

Many thanks indeed for your notice. I was confused why my article is constantly removed. My consideration is why this article is re directed to another page? Why I am not in position to fulfill the date under the article name? Can you please explain me the reasons for this if you aloud me "strange" situation in Wikipadia?DusanTR (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Darko Trifunovic. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This includes your edit as an IP. Please note that there was a consensus that this should be a redirect. Dougweller (talk) 19:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dougweller,

With due respect I did not found that article is under that role. Particularly, it is a case of living individual. My intention is to create and to add my contribution to the article about dr Darko Trifunovic and simply, it is open for all of you to contribute. DusanTR (talk) 19:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr.Scott, Many thanks indeed for your notice. I was confused why my article is constantly removed. My consideration is why this article is re directed to another page? Why I am not in position to fulfill the date under the article name? Can you please explain me the reasons for this if you aloud me "strange" situation in Wikipadia?DusanTR (talk) 19:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Let me try to help you. Each article has its own discussion page. In this case Talk:Darko Trifunović. If you read the discussion there, you'll see under the section "Is this biography neccessary?" that editors discussed and agreed that there should not be any article for "Darko Trifunović" because all the information felt important enough for an encyclopedia was on the article Report about Case Srebrenica.

How wikipedia works is by discussion and consensus. If you don't agree with the result of that discussion, then you are entitled to make your case on that talk page, and if you can persuade other users of the merits of it, then the article can be restored. If other editors don't agree, then the redirect will stay in place. If you've any other questions, just ask them here. I am watching this page. However, if you want to discuss what should happen to the article please do it on the article's talk page.--Scott Mac 19:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong page

Please click on this Talk:Darko Trifunovic to add your comments and see the earlier discussion, you created a new talk page that no one will even know about. Dougweller (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]