User talk:Dwonefulup

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dwonefulup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because it is totally unjustified

Decline reason:

you're not actually blocked, at least not directly. Its likely you've been caught in an autoblock. you need to follow the instructions you get when you try to edit Jac16888 ^Talk 21:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Dwonefulup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

167.206.75.157 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tweezlewuzzer". The reason given for Tweezlewuzzer's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts".

Blocking administrator: Ericorbit (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You really aren't allowed to create new accounts to avoid your block. Unfortunately, since you were blocked for using multiple accounts in a disruptive way, and you're still doing that, I'm afraid there isn't much chance of your being unblocked anytime soon. My suggestion is that you take a week away from Wikipedia for every sockpuppet you created- in your case, that would be eleven weeks, unless you have other accounts that we haven't noticed yet. Then, if you want to request an unblock, make sure that you can make some very specific promises about the kinds of useful edits you will make, and that you can promise not to use multiple accounts again in a way that administrators will find believable. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the autoblock, I've gone ahead and directly blocked this account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am making very useful edits now! So that's no problem at all. Dwonefulup (talk) 22:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Dwonefulup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

167.206.75.157 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tweezlewuzzer". The reason given for Tweezlewuzzer's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts".

Blocking administrator: Ericorbit (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: That doesn't matter. If you're blocked, then you are not entitled to edit; that's called block evasion. Please request unblocking from your main account. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]