User talk:Dybeck
Welcome!
Hello, Dybeck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 15:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup Taskforce[edit]
I've added Desire (album) by Bob Dylan to your desk. RJFJR 00:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Closed. I'm going to tinker a little with the page but I think the major cleanup is done. Dybeck 01:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Sarokin[edit]
- You are quite correct, he was not a Supreme Court judge, my mistake. Best wishes, Lion King 11:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Objectivity[edit]
- In the context of the sentence, you are correct. Just one point though, the article states that, "Carter has never been declared innocent", but it's also true in a "legal technical sense," he has never been found guilty. He has never been exonerated by the courts, but the evidence against him still stands. Best wishes, Lion King 16:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Will you please take a look at the latest edit to this page. I really am tired of people omitting facts from aticles about Rubin Carter. Thank you, Lion King 20:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Which of the two facts are you disputing? That the Supreme Court granted them a new trial on a technicality? (as recorded in Court documents). Or the fact that the jury were out for a period of 9 hours? (as recorded in Court documents). "Despite winning the right to a new trial", is a phrase which hides the facts, which seems to reflect your point of view. Lion King 14:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Fair points, can't really take issue with them although I'd like to! Thanks for your time. Best wishes, Lion King 16:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Harry Potter[edit]
| Hello, Dybeck. Over at WikiProject Harry Potter we're trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name, along with all other project participants, has been placed on the inactive list. If you'd like to get involved again, please place your name back on the active list, and take a look at the project talk page for the latest happenings. |
RHB(AWB) 21:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter
Please re-register[edit]
Hello, Dybeck! You are receiving this notice because the Cleanup Taskforce has been inactive, as a result of this all active taskforce members are being asked to re-register.
For more information see: Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Not Dead Yet
If you do not re-register here within 15 days of receiving this notice your name will be removed from the membership list (if you were unable to reply to this notice in time, you can just add you name back).
RJFJR 03:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Dybeck. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)