User talk:Dyrnych
I will usually respond to comments here. Politely, if possible.
Cultural appropriation image[edit]
Hi, I think it would be more helpful if you left a reason why I 'need to take it up on the talk page'. what you wrote sounds pretty cryptic and demanding. I will btw gladly take this up on the talk page after, but my reason is simple: it makes the article better and is an accepted convention to have an illustrative photo by the lead. 189.217.86.184 (talk) 02:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. The reason why I reverted your edit and suggested you take it up on the talk page is that, as you identified in your post, there's a dispute about whether the image should be on the page. Discussing the issue on the talk page is the way we resolve disputes. You may think the image makes the article better, but other people clearly disagree. Dyrnych (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- You are mistaken. I put another image (a rasta wig for sale at Disney) at the top and the image was deleted for not being relevant to the article at all. Thus I moved a different image (a non-indigenous person wearing an indigenous headdress) and put it at the top. You then reverted. I am interested in providing a visual example near the lead as it helps the article. I am only selecting images already in the article. Does that make sense? 189.217.86.184 (talk) 05:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I am talking on the talk page, I contacted you here because I thought we had a simple misunderstanding. Turns out it is a complicated misunderstanding. It is not clear at all what image is being discussed on the talk page, there is a mention of photoshopping, and that is not the case with either image I moved.. I was operating under the assumption that the images on the page were 'approved' in some way and simply moving one to the top would help the article. Thanks. 189.217.86.184 (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)