User talk:ECUADORGIANTS
May 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Josh Gibson because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 19:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Josh Gibson. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Josh Gibson was changed by ECUADORGIANTS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981166 on 2015-05-05T21:58:45+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content as you have done to Josh Gibson If you continue to do so, you may be blocked. You have been Warned.
You may be blocked without further warning.
please stop your Disruptive editing your edits show Vandalism and you've been vandalizing Wikipedia articles. Please Stop!!! This is second Warning.
This is Your Last and Final warning to Wikipedia
You are now Permanently Blocked for abusing Wikipedia and Mocking Wikipedia and for your Disruptive editing and Never listened to your warnings and Vandalizing more than 100 Wikipedia Articles
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Josh Gibson with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 02:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Josh Gibson. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 02:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 02:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
ECUADORGIANTS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It was wrong to block me because I wanted to help Wikipedia and not do vandalism. There is no point denying something I did because my edits are always checked by other users. I promise credibly, that I will stop doing what I did that got me blocked. I am here to contribute Wikipedia and improve Wikipedia articles and help make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia.
Decline reason:
I disagree, blocking you was the correct call. PhilKnight (talk) 17:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ECUADORGIANTS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It was right to block me because I vandalized and did disruptive editing. There is no point in denying edits I have done because they are and will be always checked by other users. Wikipedia is a good encyclopedia with good administrators, great users and have great articles to read. I have done abusive and disruptive editing and vandalism I should never have done, on Wikipedia that I have been blocked.
Decline reason:
I concur, you have engaged on a campaign of disruption that saw you and your various sockpuppets blocked. That's not a reason to be unblocked, though. In particular, you should request to be unblocked from your original account, and you should credibly explain how unblocking you will improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 18:19, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ECUADORGIANTS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
unblocking me will improve Wikipedia by improving articles, prevent vandalism will show contributions to other users and will help make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. Wikipedia has great administrators, and welcomes new users to Wikipedia, and Wikipedia will be a better encyclopedia.
Decline reason:
Even now as you claim that you've suddenly reformed, your lack of sincerity can be demonstrated by you requesting unblock from multiple accounts. Max Semenik (talk) 22:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.