User talk:Eapos

This is BULL![edit]

I am not this "cpofserozza" character! I am Eapos! Why am I efin blocked? This is completely unfair and unjust! I DEMAND to be unblocked IMMEDIATELY!

Elisabeth Vantar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eapos (talk • contribs) 3:06, 3 November 2006

Lady Nicholas Windsor[edit]

I am not sure where you are getting your information from but Paola title is Lady Nicholas Windsor, there is certainly not 'of Kent' and the title Princess is not legal anyway. --Berks105 19:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly don't understand the British peerage system. Lord Nicholas's style comes from him being the younger son of a Duke, and and this always 'Lord' before forename. The fact is father is Duke of Kent is neither here nor there. Many pages in Wikipedia (Styles in the United Kingdom for one) would back me up on this. And whether she is a Princess or not, after marriage its immeratial as she takes her husbands rank. --Berks105 11:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still you have no idea what you are talking about. The 'of Kent' is totally your invention. Princess Margaret is a totally differant styling, she was a Princess and a Countess. Younger sons of duke's are styled 'Lord' before the forename and many users would back me up on this (ask User:Proteus, User:DBD, User:Kittybrewster), they will all tell you the same as I have. And with regards to her being a Princess, this is not legal (for one, the Court Circular have not used it for her or her parents) and she would never be styled how you suggest. --Berks105 12:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT IS THIS?[edit]

How many times do I have to say that I AM NOT cpofserozza! cpofserozza is a man staying with ym family, he rents our cottage from us. We have asked him to stop using his account, because we keep getting blocked...but he insists! How do we go and stop getting our IP blocked just because he uses the same one? I find this incriminating and unreasonable.

Elisabeth Vantar Eapos5 November 2006 (UTC)

I've unblocked you and removed the autoblock. Please try again. If you are still blocked, post ehre again and I will look into it further. Gwernol 01:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts[edit]

Please sign your messages by typing four tildes after them. Like this ~~~~ - Kittybrewster 10:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kilaécŭs[edit]

I would like to thank you for your comments on the talk page to delete my article on my Gypsy Family. Thank you again! Princess Elisabeth Vantar 21:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be facetious. But the difficulty is that here, facts get included only if there are reliable third-party sources (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). Unless you can find somewhere else reporting the existence of your Family, like a newspaper, the single free-hosting website isn't going to be enough (especially as it's quite an unusual claim). Tearlach 22:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 01:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paramount chief[edit]

A number of your contributions to Paramount Chief appear to be hoaxes and have been reverted. Please only contribute verifiable encyclopaedic material. Rexparry sydney 03:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]