User talk:Earth100/Archive1

Mawar

Yep, Mawar is now equivalent to a Category 3 Typhoon since the JTWC are saying that the MSW is now 100 knots, however remember its only equivalent since the JTWC doesnt officially use it. As for Vandalism, yu only need to report it to me or the Administrators Noticeboard in very rare cases where the page is being heavily vandalized by someone.Jason Rees (talk) 02:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I dont 100% know what they do but they are people who can block people from editing.Jason Rees (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that will be excellent for bad users! No wonder why we should be good users! :D Earth100 (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Earth100. You have new messages at Solarra's talk page.
Message added 11:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 11:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Is it working now?

<3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 12:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, it is working now, thanks!!!-- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk ߷ _Contribs 12:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is absolutely lovely, love what you did with it <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 12:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it for you hun, paste this into the signature box:

[[User:Earth100|<font color="#DAA520" face="Comic Sans MS">''' ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕'''</font>]] <sup> [[Use talk:Earth100|<font color="#ADD8E6">Talk</font>]]</sup>   <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Earth100|<font color="#B22222"> Contribs </font>]]</sub>

With Love <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 09:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It works now! -- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk _Contribs 05:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For sourcing your contributions in the edit summary. :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My first Barnstar on Wikipedia! This is amazing! Thank You Solarra! ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk _Contribs 05:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Hill

I moved Buffalo Hill (Hong Kong) into the article space, as I believe it is ready. Congratulations on your first article! :-)

<3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 09:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome hun :-D That article makes me want to visit Buffalo Hill! Just something I noticed, the talk page link in your signature doesn't quite work. I went ahead and fixed it for you here:

[[User:Earth100|<font color="#DAA520" face="Comic Sans MS">''' ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕'''</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Earth100|<font color="#ADD8E6">Talk</font>]]

Always <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 12:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Umm..it doesn't work, it says: "Invalid raw signature. Check HTML tags." -- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk _Contribs 12:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Try this one:

[[User:Earth100|<font color="#DAA520" face="Comic Sans MS">''' ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Earth100|<font color="#ADD8E6">Talk</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Earth100|<font color="#B22222">Contribs</font>]]</sub>

You can see it at User:Solarra/sandbox :-)

<3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 12:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It works! Thank You!-- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕^Talk_Contribs 13:11, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A notice

Tropical Storm Khanun 08w at Peak Intensity Jul 17 2012.jpg is not so proper, as the JMA still estimates that it will be 50kt. -- Meow 13:17, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hey there! I noticed you added some content to Typhoon Vicente (2012), and in the edit summary you included where you got the info from. For citing purposes, at the bare minimum you should include the source next to the content in a hyperlink, like this [1]. If you want to go the extra mile, you should use template:cite news and do it like this - ^[1] I fixed that one for you. Cheers! :) --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:51, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noticed you copied the content directly from that source. That is a copyright violation, which is very bad. You have to write everything on Wiki in your own words. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you Hurricanehink! You gave me a lovely advice! Thanks! I'll do as you say!-- ✯Earth100✯ ^‿^^Talk_Contribs 13:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great! If you need any help, ever, I'm always around. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, yeah, yeah, i fix'ing it right now!-- ✯Earth100✯ ^‿^^Talk_Contribs 12:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Saola (2012)

Hello, Earth100, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Typhoon Saola (2012), appears to be directly copied from http://www.eosnap.com/tropical-storms/typhoon-saola-10w-causes-problems-in-philippines-july-30th-2012/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Typhoon Saola (2012) if necessary. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bot, it is the site which copied from us!!-- ✯Earth100✯ ^‿^^Talk_Contribs 05:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do this when uploading images

Use a proper title like Saola August 1 2012. No need TY, 10W that kind of things.
Place a category for it.

This is my last suggestion. -- Meow 07:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haikui

Hi there! well I'm from Manila and Haikui is very far to us. However, the storm's slow movement enhanced the southwest monsoon which also resulted to be a stationary monsoon. severe flooding already struck us because 472 millimeters of rain was already pour down here. Hope you could help us by simply praying. Thanks co - editor. we will survive this. stay strong! Jpuligan 12 (talk) 09:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Annular cyclone

Hi. Thanks for your insightful comment regarding annular typhoons and hurricanes. Typically annular storms become stable in terms of intensity despite remaining over marginal conditions, and Nida's upwelling of cooler water likely influenced this bit. However, Nida maintained not only its intensity but also its position for a long period, allowing it to affect the atmospheric flow and oceanic temperatures over a much larger area (I made a suggestion in 2009 that it was actually influencing the El Nino, which eventually became a Central Pacific Modoki-type that often supports Atlantic tropical cyclone activity via the Western Hemisphere Warm Pool; another Modoki ENSO seems to be forming this year). Wikipedia has plenty of information on Atlantic annular storms, but it is possible that the dynamics of West Pacific storms are not as well understood. There were definitely some major jet stream effects down the line after Super Typhoon Nida stalled in that area - what is it that makes the Northern Marianas region so favourable for annular storms to occur? Cheers,

~AH1 ^(discuss!) 17:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept!

Would you like to become a member of this WikiProject? Seeing your recent edits to many tropical cyclone articles, I thought you might be interested. User talk:76.10.241.86/Sign 17:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh, thank you, Thank You very much! I did added my user name to the list! It's lovely! -- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 02:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! I noticed that you had added the user-box to your user page but had not become a member. I had actually just became an official member today too. User talk:76.10.241.86/Sign 04:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh, well feel free to explore my user page! Thank you very much of the invitation!-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 04:51, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to quit

Many editors suck. -- Meow 05:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why Meow? Is it because of me?-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 05:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i understand.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 11:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Please understand that you are not properly citing information you obtain. Sourcing through an edit summary does not constitute as a proper citation. You must use the {{cite web}} template to source all information within the article. Regards, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 15:20, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Typhoon Haikui, Earth100!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

reviewed already tagged.

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks

Thanks for your kindness, the star. Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 07:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

O, you deserve it. Wikipedians who contribute wikipedia with images should be deserved!-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 11:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on proposed Template talk:Infobox hurricane current changes

Hello, Earth100. I am proposing a new version of the Template:Infobox hurricane current template, located in its sandbox. Would you like to comment on this change?

Thank you,

–– Anonymouse321 (talk) 17:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You received this message because you have contributed to tropical cyclone related articles and I thought you would be interested.

Thank you, this talk page is always free for such discussions! Feel Free!-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 02:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you! [2]

Hello, thanks for the star you bestowed upon me. I wish I could meet you someday.

Let me clarify on my edits, with all due respect: a) I am only into photography, and I don't desire to expand articles; b) however, Wikipedia rules vis-a-vis good articles, must have proportional number of images to the number of paragraphs with links; c) as you notice, I never complained nor revert any edits of my images inserted, since I state that Wikipedia is a continuous edit thing; I have no monopoly of my edit or the article; in face best articles are edited by more that 1,000 edits by editors; d) here in Philippines, it is so stressful to expand articles just to put in my images in proportion, as you duly noted; d) but most of the times, the server and internet here are so slow; e) rest assured that if pc gets fast and I would have no stressful times, I will try to expand the articles that I inserted the images. As pattern I desire to emulate Valenzuela, Philippines or any other better Philippine town article. I greatly appreciate your creating categories for my images. As you notice, I only put 1 category, since, the computer is so slow and if the images fail to upload, I would need about 5 hours just for 7 images. Finally, I desire to finish Bulacan, Nueva Ecija and Aurora, inter alia. I deeply understand that many images are bad for a short paragraph or sentence of an article. But, but and but, for example, a town must have at least 4 images of a heritage town hall, 4 or 5 for a church, and at least 1 for the major points like heritage schools, banks, etc. Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Barnstar

Thank you very much, I was beginning to think I was never going to get one. United States Man (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, i think every gentlemen deserves one! -- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 02:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Message

Hello, Earth100. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong.
Message added 21:04, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sandy

Hey, in the future, you shouldn't copy and paste an article when you want to move it. There is a move icon at the top of the page. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opps, sorry, that's because i'm used to the other way.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 15:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What other way? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Way you told me not to.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 15:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in the future, you should move articles, not just copy and paste. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:38, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you for your input!-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 15:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Star for thee

	The Diligence Barnstar
	Thank you very much for the Star! In my humble submission, you must also keep this star. Cheers! --Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 12:03, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you very much, you are really kind.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 12:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you very much. Hope to be editing article together in the future :) TyphoonWatchers (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TyphoonWatchers (talk • contribs) 08:33, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorological history of Hurricane Sandy

It wasn't vandalism, it's honestly cluttered if you keep the images arranged like you have it. I suggest, if you keep the images, moving them around the article seeing were they would fit best, because at the moment it looks like a mess. Supportstorm (talk) 05:11, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't even in the article, and it was in a subarticle, which needs images. I don't see any space problem.-- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕^Talk_Contribs 05:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well at least remove Sandy_Oct_29_17.35(UTC).jpg because it is pushing the Dissipation section to far down the page, move the Sandy_Oct_30_2012.jpg image to the right, and move Sandy_as_a_tropical_disturbance_Oct_20_2012.jpg to the left. This would allow equal image ratio to the article as with my example. Supportstorm (talk) 05:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, because that will mean the Origins section will look really narrow, and fewer images showing landfall, which are very important. I don't see why it should be like that. And Supportstorm, you see to have a different personalty these days.-- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕^Talk_Contribs 05:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've adjusted my point of view of the page, by Ctrl + and - to see the possibility of other viewer's view, and the dissipation section just remains below the Post-tropical transition and final landfall section, so i don't see any problems. Sincerely, -- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕^Talk_Contribs 05:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It may be possible that my computer monitor's ratio is configured differently than yours. Sorry if I been acting different, I've been going through a rough spot in my personal life. Just remember that I'm never going to do something that is purposefully nonconstructive, I usual have a reason for my actions :) Supportstorm (talk) 06:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also have a reason for my actions, and i always think twice.☉‿☉☂-- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk _Contribs 06:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please check my 2 articles, the second should be deleted, since the 1st is the article. This is my first article so please help me. Thanks. Santiago Apostol Parish Church and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Santiago Apostol Parish Church--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your article, seems fine, though a talk page should be created, and your second one-is it you want it to be deleted? Reply to answer whether or not, do you want your second article to be listed for deletion, and i will help. -- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk _Contribs 15:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, please delete it

Thanks for your time. Actually, I was under stress for having uploaded the 400 years old images of this great Church in Philippine history. I forgot to just put the red and created the article. Instead I read the Wikipedia rules and clicked the Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Santiago Apostol Parish Church, only to remember that I should have forthwith created the article. Hence, please help me delete Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Santiago Apostol Parish Church for it now moot and academic in view of the Santiago Apostol Parish Church. One final point. If you examine the bell tower images. I had a great fear of the heights, I climbed the bellfry tower, and when I looked down, amid the almost destroyed wooden stairs, I got so afraid, but the images are priceless, for if you examine the links I put there, the scholars never attempted to climb the bell tower to shoot the bells, made in 1891. I touched them for thee. Be there 1 inch apart, even if you're in Hong Kong. Betis Church, this article, is a story of painting, the one of a kind furniture wood carving and simply amazing. It is sad that photographers here in Philippines overlooked these bells due to fear of climbing and with my Nikon AW100, Wikipedia has for now, these National Cultural Treasures. Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 06:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, different for, me, I"m yearning for High, really HIGH places!! I will ask an administrator to delete it for YOU :D. -- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk _Contribs 06:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just did a history merge, instead of deleting. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help, again

Hi Earth100, can you, if you have time, please check my bat edits [3] and [4], the pictures of the bats are at night, and I have no way to classify them bringing them to our experts, so, I put them in the Bats and the golden crown bat. Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 09:25, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i think you put them in the right place, but your second image (4) need a bit of cropping, so would you like me to crop it, so that it will show the bats more up-close(i want crop too much)?. -- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk _Contribs 14:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for your help and if you wish to crop it, then please go ahead. I usually do not edit or crop my images, since I desire better editors to edit my images. For I upload raw images, and they can easily be cropped, edited or fixed. Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YI enhanced and cropped it!- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ ^Talk _Contribs 14:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jelawat images

Hey, I really disagree with having that extra image in the Jelawat article. It simply adds too much whitespace. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:55, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding a third image into the Jelawat article. There is no need for the article to be so dominated by images. The images aren't supposed to go down into the see also section, and there is no need for so much whitespace (and yes, there is a lot of whitespace). Please stop trying to add another image in. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise with the Fujiwhara effect page. Please discuss on the talk page. Right now, there is a pretty clear consensus against too many images. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[5] - why should I wait, per this edit? There is no need for a third image. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with you again?

The JTWC is NOT an RSMC, so you cannot use Typhoon Bopha before the JMA upgrades it. Why cannot you improve yourself? I have tried to help you for long time, but you still do not accept! -- Meow 08:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I originally didn't want to do it, but after you created an article(i forgot which one) a few months ago, before JMA upgraded it to a typhoon, (JTWC already upgraded it to Cat 1) i decided that it was okay. Besides, i was really busy working on the article of Bopha... -- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 08:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 08:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But you also changed it to Typhoon in the season article, didn’t you? Please provide correct information instead of grabbing an article in the future. I may have created it, but the title must be Tropical Storm first. The problem is that someone may change it back to Tropical Storm Bopha, and it will take some time to change back to Typhoon Bopha again. I hope this will not happen. -- Meow 09:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, okay, thank you for you advice, i got it clearly.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 09:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No... They really moved it to Tropical Storm Bopha (2012) so early... I doubt if they will also do it fast when Bopha becomes a TY. -- Meow 13:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, okay, major mistake i made, i now fully understand. Dang, why was i so dumb?-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 13:28, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have high confidence that the JMA will upgrade Bopha to a TY within one hour. If we cannot directly move it back to Typhoon Bopha (2012), that will be their fault, not you. -- Meow 15:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it back to Typhoon Bopha (2012). Anyway, it is an incredible tropical cyclone. -- Meow 18:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You very much, i'll keep this in memory. -- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 12:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hey, I was wondering what this was about. You never really answered my question, why you copied the content from my sandbox for a sandbox of your own. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 07:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look, i'm busy, and this is non of your business as this is my talk page. Thank You.

It is my business because I commented and you never replied. Could you just respond when you get the chance then? It doesn't have to be today. I'd just like to know what happened. That's all, plain and simple. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, i just want it to be the Idea Starter okay?!-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 04:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have to revert it back

Your picture of Bopha is actually the same to another, but with wrong colours. So I have to revert it back, sorry. -- Meow 03:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meow, GO to the source!! Supportstorm image has the WRONG color! Hang on a second, i've just changed the file to official normal colors, however the definition higher than supportstorm's.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 03:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you still have not realised what are your problems: Lower quality, not focusing, and too many unnecessary descriptions. -- Meow 03:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meow, where are you getting those colors from? That's not what the original image looks like. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More descriptions is better. I don't see why it is unnecessary.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 03:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because here is Wikipedia not a meteorological agency responding to the JTWC. -- Meow 03:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meow, you are crazy, can't you agree in some things?!-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 03:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am just stopping someone keeping destroying Wikipedia. -- Meow 03:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And i am fixing the freaking vandal who doesn't want a better Wikipedia. I've just reported you.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 03:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to interrupt this lovely little spat you two are have to clarify that I did alter the colors, but here is my reason. The EO used raw data to make that image and did not process the image with a true color algorithm, and I tried to correct it. Here is what it is really supposed to look like. Only EO's image was higher quality and didn't have labels on it. Supportstorm (talk) 04:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Supportstorm, i have accepted your wonderful image which is tons better than mines, and i'm discussing on another image. Have you noticed the Bopha article? -- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 04:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And meow, your Grammars, YOUR GRAMMARS! You said:I am just stopping someone keeping destroying Wikipedia. SHOULD be said:I'm just stopping someone who keeps destroying Wikipedia. What on earth is up to you? -- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉ ^Talk _Contribs 04:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indenting on talk pages

If you add a colon to the beginning of a line, it will indent the line and make it easier to follow the conversation. Here is an example:

Hi, this is a Wikipedia talk page. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is a Wikipedia talk page? User ABCDEFG12345

A talk page is a place where users can talk about the main page. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's cool! User ABCDEFG12345

This makes it easier to follow conversations. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know how to do it, but i don't often use it, thank you.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Your recent editing history at Typhoon Bopha (2012) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Both of you have violated 3RR, and you need to stop edit warring. Take it to the talk page. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help please, review my 2nd article

Hi, Earth 100, I was awed by this River, it is simply magic. So, I created my 2nd article Tapuacan River. If you have time, please go over it and review or revise per the Rules. Thanks and cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 14:20, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't review articles, but i can double check them, and contribute them for you. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 14:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Earth 100, for your time and edits. The river is so beautiful, I have never seen any, in my life, like this. Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 14:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice photos, but i've seen Crystal clear, blue waters in a stream in Lantau island, Hong Kong, clearer than the ones i saw in your photos, and were almost free of brown algae. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong..?

I believe you must be confused. I didnt revert any of your edits. I reverted Objectivesea's edits, restoring your version of the article as on 18:15, 6 December 2012. However, if there is anything else that might have hurt your feelings, please let me know. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I created this article, Ma-Cho Temple, even if I am a Catholic. You may be interested in going over this Taoist Temple thing. Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for editing my article. The temple is so magnifiscent since 1975. Imagine, it resisted the July 1990 earthquake that devastated many of our Catholic Churches. The Taipei laborers built this Ma-Cho Temple. I am sure if you examine the pictures, even if I just used the All Weather Nikon (for it is handy, and I cannot use high end Nikon, for water photography is my main image obsession), this will be a respite from our stress-laden situations. I hope that your day like mine is not made harder by editing Wikipedia. We are here to improve it and not to be tired. Look at my pictures and yours, they will make us less tired of problems. Cheers and thanks again. Cathedral of St. William the Hermit, our Church is full of mess, the electric wires, the dirty surroundings, I just captured the clean ones. Cheers again.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 13:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of AN/I

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 13:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I really think we could improve things if you were actively participating in the discussion there. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Bopha

You said, "Also Nasa states it at the "Typhoon Bopha Brings Heavy Rains to the Philippines" section." What does it state in that section? Inks.LWC (talk) 14:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Last sentence of paragraph 2. In reality, the whole convection around the storm dissipated, but i only sate it with source.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 14:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How could something written on December 4 apply to something that you claim happened on December 5? And the last sentence says that banding decreased on the eastern, not southeastern side of the storm. But now that you've pointed that out, I can fix the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 14:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inks.LWC, mind if you add more information of what you have adjusted, like the intensity for a specific date, thank you.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 15:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you're asking for. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:55, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typical for users like you.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:38, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No... the sentence doesn't make sense. You're missing a word or used a wrong word(s), or something. I don't understand what it is that you're asking. Inks.LWC (talk) 12:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NPA warning

Calling another good faith edit vandalism, as you did here, is a direct violation of WP:NPA.

You're lining up an awful lot of final warnings for violating all sorts of different WP policies. Why not take a break? Step back, review some of our policies, stop fighting with other editors...maybe you're just too caught up in trying to "win" right now? I don't know. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Evan

Evan really does not need another image, especially one that at the moment can not be proved to be Evan with text products.Jason Rees (talk) 11:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is Evan and besides the meteorological history needs an image to show a image of the storm one day before it's dissipation.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No the meteorological history does not need to "show a image of the storm one day before it's dissipation" since we can not even prove that the remnants existed during December 26 at the moment using text products since TCWC Wellington dropped it from their warnings during December 25.Jason Rees (talk) 11:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

Could you either please substantially rephrase or request deletion of User:Earth100/UBX/Japan Dislike? It directly violates the WP:USERBOX guideline, in that all userboxes must still be civil, specifically, "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive." I don't think there's any way that someone would consider that box to be appropriate. The Yushin Maru userbox is on the borderline, but probably okay because it's about a ship, not about a nation full of people. Please note that if you do not choose to remove/alter the userbox in the next very short while, I will be requesting its deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Earth100/UBX/Japan Dislike

User:Earth100/UBX/Japan Dislike, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Earth100/UBX/Japan Dislike and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Earth100/UBX/Japan Dislike during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 15:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Here is a kitten for being a really great friend. I know how much you love kittens

Leeboy100 23:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Checkuser

A Checkuser, User:DeltaQuad has run a CU on the two accounts in question, Earth100 and Earth101. Unsurprisingly, the IPs don't match, but we didn't expect they would since Earth101 clearly said they were using a proxy IP in their unblock request. Separate CU action on that IP is likely. The Checkuser declined to overturn and instructed that behavior should be used to make a determination. This was expected. Based on the available information, including statements since the block, I maintain that it is very likely the two accounts are the same person, thus I would decline to change my block. Of course, any admin is free to review and make their own determination, contact the CU or myself if they want more information, and/or act without my permission. Earth100 should follow the guidance found in the Guide to appealing blocks if they wish to appeal this block. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyway of being able to figure out if the IP address is Meows or not since Earth100 is alleging up above that Meow is the one who opened the account.Jason Rees (talk) 01:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Earth100 would have to talk to the CU, and present enough evidence to justify running the checkuser process, or start an SPI investigation and supply the diffs there. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For some micro-behavioral (linguistic/typographical) reasons, I actually don't think that Earth100 and Earth101 are the same user. I can reveal them to a CU privately, but I don't want to post them here since I don't want to help the likely Joe jobber. I'll email Dennis Brown with the details as a start. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You very much Qwyrxian, for your different, alternative view point on me, as i am a good man, and will never do extremely bad acts.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look everybody, i accept my 3 day block as i really did violated a law,

but a block for a week? To me i fink something fishy is going on, as i have totally no idea of anything of the Earth101 account. I understand, and deserve the 3 day block, but i'm honest that there's noting to do with me of the Earth101 account, and i hope there is a prove for it. I've got things to do but now i got to wait a whole week.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've talked to Dennis Brown off-wiki. One thing we agree on is that it's actually very hard to make a determination either way, since the Earth101 account made very few edits so there's not much behavioral evidence to go on, and, as already explained above, the technical evidence doesn't help. Dennis Brown still thinks the two accounts are likely operated by the same person, but also offered to let me reduce the block if I was more confident of the difference. Since to me the evidence if ambiguous, I'm willing to assume that the account was legitimately not yours. I'm going to reduce your block to approximately the original three days (plus or minus a few hours in case I don't get my math right). Note that none of this changes the fact that your behavior must change upon your return regarding the reasons that I originally blocked you. If you do find yourself getting frustrated by another user, either walk away from Wikipedia until you feel better, or ask an experienced user (including me, if you like) for help. In addition, please do make sure that you've fully digested how serious we are about [{WP:V|verifiabilty]] and [{WP:OR|original research]]. Specifically in your case, that means that you can't put in any information based upon what you can figure out from reading a satellite photo, based on your extensive knowledge of how storm systems develop, etc. If you want to add something, find a source that says precisely the information that you want to add. Again, ask for help if you're not certain, or if you think something is safe to add but aren't sure, try proposing it on the article talk page first. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you very much Qwyrxian! I will listen to all the advice i am given.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 09:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- To verify, what Qwyrxian says is completely correct. As he is more familiar with the style of the editor, I trust his judgement here. I would also encourage you to take his advice to heart. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, i will take his advice to heart. Happy new year 2013 admins!--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 22:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Ma-on (2011)

[6] - hey, I just wanted to let you know I reverted your edit for a few reasons. First, the image didn't really fit in the article due to spacing. Secondly, we can't source forums, so if you want to add that JTWC bit, you have to get a proper source. And third, I wasn't exactly sure what you were going for in the image caption, but "Severe Subtropical" doesn't make sense, sorry. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how come you reverted? The article looks bad with that image in there. Is it really needed? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it is needed, it looks Beautiful as it is good.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I highly disagree. It makes the page cluttered. If you like it that much, I'll just get rid of the other one. However, you still need to get a better source that Storm2k. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I removed the Storm2k bit again. Per WP:SPS, we can't include forums. As for the image, I don't think it's needed, but it's not worth warring over. You just came back from a ban, and you said you understood what you did... the addition of unreferenced/improperly sourced material has to stop. I'd encourage you to read WP:RS so you completely understand what's required. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✔Read.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what this edit summary meant, but there's no need to have so many duplicate images in the same article. It squeezes the text unnecessarily. I removed one of them. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High-pressure area picture

First, welcome back. I hope you've had time to think about your actions in the past and now understand the policies of Wikipedia. I have High-pressure area on my watchlist, so I noticed when you made this edit. You cannot continue to add information that is not in the source. Nowhere in the article does it mention anything about such a formation being "rare" or "unusual". Furthermore, instead of just reverting people, discuss changes like that on the talk page. It seems like you still may have questions with what the policies are on original research, so if you post on the talk page with what you want to change the text to, other editors can comment on those changes before you impliment them, and we can help you understand if your proposed edits adhere to the policies and guidelines. Furthermore, as I encouraged you before, I hope that you consider getting a mentor. Inks.LWC (talk) 01:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why I shouldn't indefinitely block you, Earth100, and get this over with. You were blocked for quite a while, your block was extended, you begged to come back, swearing you were better and had changed...and within a day your back to uncivil edit summaries and adding unsourced info. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it, being blocked forever for contributing Wikipedia? I waited and waited but i wasn't unblocked until that day, and i decided because i wasn't unblocked i don't need to change. If you want me to change, then i will do it right now. And if i ever get blocked again, i would not allow it to be more than 1 week, because there is no difference, only more down side. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can get blocked permanently from Wikipedia. You need to change your editing habits. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't deserve it. In fact for all those blocks i was blocked, i could have made a big difference even without those blocks, but i did not got the chance, causing me to be now in a low mood.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one of the first things you do when you get unblocked is go back to edit warring on a page that got you blocked in the first place. I suggest you avoid too much conflict if you don't want to be banned. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. At least for me, consider this a final chance. Let me leave you with two simple pieces of advice: if something makes you at all irritated, take a break away from Wikipedia and calm down before you comment, revert, or otherwise do something that will be a problem. Second, if you have questions, just ask someone. In many cases, at least for now, it's probably in your best interest to ask before you act. Except for absolutely blatant vandalism like "This hurricane makes me hot!", there's really no harm in letting an edit you disagree with sit around for a few hours/days while you discuss the matter. You don't have to be this cautious forever, but for now, I think it will help you. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Castle in the Sky image

You cannot have the Castle in the Sky image on your user page. Per WP:NFCC#9, "Non-free content is allowed only in articles (not disambiguation pages), and only in article namespace, subject to exemptions." Since your user page is not one of the exemptions, that image cannot be on your page. Inks.LWC (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Ma-on (2011)

[7] - hey, I just wanted to let you know I reverted your edit for a few reasons. First, the image didn't really fit in the article due to spacing. Secondly, we can't source forums, so if you want to add that JTWC bit, you have to get a proper source. And third, I wasn't exactly sure what you were going for in the image caption, but "Severe Subtropical" doesn't make sense, sorry. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how come you reverted? The article looks bad with that image in there. Is it really needed? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it is needed, it looks Beautiful as it is good.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I highly disagree. It makes the page cluttered. If you like it that much, I'll just get rid of the other one. However, you still need to get a better source that Storm2k. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I removed the Storm2k bit again. Per WP:SPS, we can't include forums. As for the image, I don't think it's needed, but it's not worth warring over. You just came back from a ban, and you said you understood what you did... the addition of unreferenced/improperly sourced material has to stop. I'd encourage you to read WP:RS so you completely understand what's required. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✔Read.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what this edit summary meant, but there's no need to have so many duplicate images in the same article. It squeezes the text unnecessarily. I removed one of them. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High-pressure area picture

First, welcome back. I hope you've had time to think about your actions in the past and now understand the policies of Wikipedia. I have High-pressure area on my watchlist, so I noticed when you made this edit. You cannot continue to add information that is not in the source. Nowhere in the article does it mention anything about such a formation being "rare" or "unusual". Furthermore, instead of just reverting people, discuss changes like that on the talk page. It seems like you still may have questions with what the policies are on original research, so if you post on the talk page with what you want to change the text to, other editors can comment on those changes before you impliment them, and we can help you understand if your proposed edits adhere to the policies and guidelines. Furthermore, as I encouraged you before, I hope that you consider getting a mentor. Inks.LWC (talk) 01:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why I shouldn't indefinitely block you, Earth100, and get this over with. You were blocked for quite a while, your block was extended, you begged to come back, swearing you were better and had changed...and within a day your back to uncivil edit summaries and adding unsourced info. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it, being blocked forever for contributing Wikipedia? I waited and waited but i wasn't unblocked until that day, and i decided because i wasn't unblocked i don't need to change. If you want me to change, then i will do it right now. And if i ever get blocked again, i would not allow it to be more than 1 week, because there is no difference, only more down side. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can get blocked permanently from Wikipedia. You need to change your editing habits. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't deserve it. In fact for all those blocks i was blocked, i could have made a big difference even without those blocks, but i did not got the chance, causing me to be now in a low mood.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 04:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one of the first things you do when you get unblocked is go back to edit warring on a page that got you blocked in the first place. I suggest you avoid too much conflict if you don't want to be banned. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. At least for me, consider this a final chance. Let me leave you with two simple pieces of advice: if something makes you at all irritated, take a break away from Wikipedia and calm down before you comment, revert, or otherwise do something that will be a problem. Second, if you have questions, just ask someone. In many cases, at least for now, it's probably in your best interest to ask before you act. Except for absolutely blatant vandalism like "This hurricane makes me hot!", there's really no harm in letting an edit you disagree with sit around for a few hours/days while you discuss the matter. You don't have to be this cautious forever, but for now, I think it will help you. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Castle in the Sky image

You cannot have the Castle in the Sky image on your user page. Per WP:NFCC#9, "Non-free content is allowed only in articles (not disambiguation pages), and only in article namespace, subject to exemptions." Since your user page is not one of the exemptions, that image cannot be on your page. Inks.LWC (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

^ "5 killed, 3 missing in flash floods, landslides triggered by Typhoon Vicente in Vietnam". Xinhua. 2012-07-27. Retrieved 2012-07-28.

[1] "5 killed, 3 missing in flash floods, landslides triggered by Typhoon Vicente in Vietnam". Xinhua. 2012-07-27. Retrieved 2012-07-28.

[1]