User talk:Ebrandt3007

This is Ebrandt3007's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Montrose Point Bird Sanctuary has been accepted

Montrose Point Bird Sanctuary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt reply and feedback! Out of curiosity, how could I improve this article, and raise its grading? Ebrandt3007 (talk) 17:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for submission! I had fun reviewing it. I used to live in Chicago and have biked past Montrose Beach many times — without appreciating its history and its birds! I rated it C-class per Wikipedia:Content_assessment because its info about the park's creation isn't very specific (for example, at what point in the 80s and 90s did it become an officially recognized bird sanctuary?). You can reach the highest gradings, WP:Good Article and WP:Featured Article, with their respective peer review processes. They can be rather involved, so if you're new around here, I'd personally recommend first submitting to WP:DYK which involves a more chill review process. But it's up to you! Thanks again and please let me know if you have any questions. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 17:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Algonquins of Ontario Settlement Area has been accepted

Algonquins of Ontario Settlement Area, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nog's Vision for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nog's Vision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nog's Vision until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Thank you. Ebrandt3007 (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]