Jump to content

User talk:Echavando

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Echavando! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

December 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Notre Dame High School (Sherman Oaks, California). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. These edits are not vandalism. Adding a ref improve template will encourage others to add sources as per Wikipedia policy. Epicgenius (talk) 01:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Almost everyone of the people cited as Alumni for Notre Dame High School is referenced back as having attending the school. I am going through each one of them and properly making edits on their pages. In the meantime, stop vandalizing the page and arbitrary deleting content or modifying its content and sources. If you find a person that is NOT referenced, please let me know here and we can work on that, but deleting all is just unproductive. Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Notre Dame High School (Sherman Oaks, California, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Echavando. You have new messages at Talk:Notre Dame High School (Sherman Oaks, California).
Message added 01:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have voiced my concerns there. There are no proper inline citations or reliable sources for the alumnus list. Also, I split the columns for easier reading. Epicgenius (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


List the persons that are NOT cited as proposed.

Okay...

References

  1. ^ http://www.latimes.com/sports/highschool/varsity-times/la-sp-vi-baseball-remembering-giancarlo-stanton-at-sherman-oaks-notre-dame-20141117-story.html

There is just one reference. I do not mean the blue wikilinks on the page, but rather the references under the heading named "References". I will appreciate it if you can find any sources, though. Thanks. Epicgenius (talk) 01:47, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessary, each person is cross-referenced (by wikilnks) by their on wikepages. This is the standard format and citation rule for any school's alumni. See this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_University_of_California,_Los_Angeles_people
Also note the {{BLP sources}} template on that page, stating that the article needs more sources, as well as the large comment in the edit page, stating that "Additions without a citation are subject to removal. If a citation link is broken, please replace it with one that works." You may be confusing sourcing with wikilinks. Cross-referencing doesn't apply to pages in which people are involved, especially living people. Epicgenius (talk) 02:07, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rntus[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rntus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DanielRigal (talk) 00:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just added this article and adding sources shortly. Please allow sometime for things to happen. Perhaps you can help making it better and not rush to conclusions.

Speedy deletion nomination of Rntus[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rntus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DanielRigal (talk) 00:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Echavando. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rntus, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
  • instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 00:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Echavando/sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Echavando/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DanielRigal (talk) 01:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected Sockpuppetry[edit]

This is to notify you that you are included in a Sockpuppet report: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pablomorris. You can comment there if you wish. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rntus[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rntus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DanielRigal (talk) 01:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Echavando (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use a shared IP address. Should not be blocked for actions of others

Decline reason:

That doesn't seem to be the case. You appear to have been using multiple accounts. Look at the sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Echavando. What is your connection to those other 2 users? Seems clear to me that there's evidence to support you being the same. only (talk) 22:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Echavando&oldid=756019163"