User talk:Echojoe1944

Missvain

can you please help I edited two pages Madonna like a prayer and Soul to soul with correct BPI certification I get blocked by bullies and now someone says im tom Watkins has the world gone mad.

Echojoe1944, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Echojoe1944! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Your reason here Ive just been contacted by Richard3120 as I asked them to prove their claim that what I edited was incorrect, they ignored the request 3 times this show malice bulling. unfair un proactive for wiki does anyone know how I make formal complaint | decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Missvain from the teahouse canyou please explain what ive done wrong

I edit to pages with correct BPI certification I get blocked by bullies and now someone says im tom Watkins has the world gone mad.

There's no point writing on your own talk page, nobody will see your messages here. You need to write on the Teahouse talk page if you want to discuss it. But as I have explained to you twice, you have added completely incorrect information, but you don't want to recognise it. Richard3120 (talk) 20:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Echojoe1944 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is so unfair can someone actually tell me what I done to deserve this can I have English editior contact me so I can discuss this

hi their can someone help please help me I edited two pages one being Madonna like prayer and added correct BPI certification yet its been vandlised by indianbio who been suspended before for vandalising pages and sock puppetry  who as numerous accounts and has been suspended before for this behaviour and I also edited soul to soul club classic vol 1 in the UK it sold 750.000 please check wiki page 1989 in British music ( best selling albums 1989) and added correct sales by bpi certification all sourced factually using wiki best selling album list amd also official BPI records. now ive been blocked because I reported indianbio now im not sure but I believe indianbio is the one that blocked me under a different account, why is this allowed. if members want to challenge information are they not supposed to provided the links to the source, im really confused  worked for sony music until I retired and I know what im talking about. now im blocked.

Decline reason:

Declined. This is almost impossible to make sense of, and you're probably a sock puppet of TomWatkins1970 (talk · contribs), anyway. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Echojoe1944 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Ive just been contacted by Richard3120 as I asked them to prove their claim that what I edited was incorrect, they ignored the request 3 times this show malice bulling. unfair un proactive for wiki does anyone know how I make formal complaint

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 23:44, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

report indianbio for vandalism of soul to soul page

you have been reported again for making vandalism on pages with inaccurate facts we asked that your account be restricted until you provide source to your claim

Dear senior wiki indianbio is vandalising soul to soul page and abusing other members, they had their account blocked previously on the same grounds can some block this person until they learn not to abuse members and pages ( Echojoe1944 (talk) 09:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC) ) ( Echojoe1944 (talk) 09:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC) ) ( Echojoe1944 (talk) 09:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC) ) ( Echojoe1944 (talk) 09:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC) )[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Like a Prayer (song). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Club Classics Vol. One, you may be blocked from editing. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir I worked for CBS epic and sony UK I know Madonna when 2 platinum not Gold also Soul TO SOUL VOL 1 750.000 NOT 900.000 INCURRATE BPI OFFICIAL HOW CAN YOU PROVIDE SOURCE TO YOUR CLAIM THANK YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by Echojoe1944 (talk • contribs)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. TheWinRat (talk) 17:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Club Classics Vol. One. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:38, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm {talk} 10:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use Talkpage

Dear Echojoe1944, thank you for identifying unsourced content. Next time, please place this content in the article's talk page (accessible by the "Talk" tab at the top left) instead of directly in the article. Thank you! CarelessWombat^{Let's Talk!} 20:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Richard3120

Dear Richard3120

I have checked your link and noticed you were looking at the wrong section so I have provided the correct link which shows correct platinum

https://www.bpi.co.uk/award/3860-2003-2

No, Echojoe, you are the one who is wrong. You were consistently changing the certification for the single "Like a Prayer" and insisting that the single had 792,000 sales - now you have changed your argument completely, and say you were talking about the album of the same name. You have also accused me and the administrator NinjaRobotPirate of being the same person (a false accusation easily disproved by someone running an IP check and seeing that we are in entirely different countries) and you have also accused everyone who has shown you that you are wrong of "bullying" you, which is also a completely false accusation. So I think it is unlikely you will ever be unblocked with that attitude. Richard3120 (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your block

I didn't block you - I have no power to do that. But you asked me to provide a link to prove that I was correct. I did provide links, in the message of mine that you deleted. But here they are again:

Madonna - "Like a Prayer" single, gold certification [1]

Soul II Soul - Club Classics Vol. I album, triple platinum certification [2]

Richard3120 (talk) 20:53, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

You are not permitted to blank declined unblock requests for a currently-active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 14:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Echojoe1944 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Dear wiki I have just disproved Richard3120 allegation of vanalisum Madonna like Prayer album was not Gold but was 4 x Platinum and the link has been provided https://www.bpi.co.uk/award/3860-2003-2, this proved I have been bullied and now my block should be removed Echojoe1944 (talk) 08:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request is almost incoherent. In any case, you are now arguing about the album, but your vandalism was around the single. Clearly, you are in the wrong, even if you had cited your changes, which you didn't but which you are required to do. The block appears appropriate. Yamla (talk) 14:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blanking

You were warned about blanking unblock requests but decided to continue. You have now lost access to this talk page, leaving you with WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 18:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]