User talk:EditExpress

Welcome!

Hello, EditExpress, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 15:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Verbs[edit]

Hi EditExpress. I just came across your new article and I was wondering if this may actually be a good topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. It seems to me like effectively a dictionary page which is something that Wikipedia does not want to me, see WP:NOTADICTIONARY. Also, other than the google dictionary, do you have any other sources about the etymology of the verbs? Just because a word is identical to that of an animal, it may not be related. One that sprung immediately to mind is "fry". The verb meaning the cooking activity is actually dervived from that latin "frigere". "Bat" also very different etymologies between the animal and the verb. I'm tagging the article with a suggested deletion, which gives 7 days to address issues, however, as I said initially the topic may not be suitable to start. Please let me know if you have any questions, and please don't feel discouraged to contribute. WIkipedia's rules and guidelines may seem complex, especially when starting off and creating your first articles. All the best, _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 06:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Animal Verbs[edit]

The article Animal Verbs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTADICTIONARY. The etymology of those verbs is also unclear - the root of many verbs is different to the root of the noun and would probably need to be referenced accordingly. Other than that, this strikes me like a dictionary page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 06:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Animal verbs in English for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Animal verbs in English is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal verbs in English until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 23:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:EditExpress/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:EditExpress/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:32, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EditExpress! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:32, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:EditExpress/sandbox[edit]

Hello, EditExpress. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:EditExpress/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not submit the sandbox for review unless it contains a fully-fledged draft which is considered ready for review / mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:EditExpress/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:EditExpress/sandbox[edit]

Hello, EditExpress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:EditExpress/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:EditExpress/sandbox[edit]

Hello, EditExpress. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]